Turbine Airfoil Dimples Delay Boundary Layer Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gas turbine engines experience reduced efficiency due to early boundary layer growth on the suction side of airfoils, leading to increased pressure losses and decreased power output, as the airflow separates prematurely from the airfoil surface.

Innovation Solution

The integration of dimples on the suction side of airfoils, which generate vortices by increasing and then decreasing in depth along the stream-wise direction, counteracting laminar separation and maintaining airflow attachment for a longer distance, thereby reducing boundary layer growth and enhancing aerodynamic efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional smooth airfoil surfaces are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but boundary layer separation occurs earlier causing reduced efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairfoil manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidpressure losses due to boundary layer separation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The airfoil surface incorporates dimples that create controlled porosity and surface irregularities. These dimples generate vortices that enhance mixing between the boundary layer and free stream, preventing early separation and reducing pressure losses while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standardized dimple patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The dimples introduce controlled curvature variations on the airfoil surface. These curved depressions modify the boundary layer flow characteristics by generating rotational vortices that delay separation, transforming the smooth surface into a vortex-generating textured surface that improves aerodynamic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Loss of energy

If dimples are added to the airfoil surface, then boundary layer separation is delayed improving efficiency, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure lossesVSAvoidairfoil surface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The airfoil surface is segmented into multiple discrete dimples arranged in specific patterns. This segmentation allows the complex vortex-generating function to be achieved through repeated simple geometric features rather than a continuous complex surface, simplifying the manufacturing process while maintaining the aerodynamic benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dimple parameters (depth, diameter, spacing, distribution) are optimized to achieve the desired vortex generation and boundary layer control. By carefully selecting these parameters, the surface complexity is minimized while maximizing the aerodynamic performance improvement, creating a balance between complexity and benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If dimples with varying depth are used to generate vortices, then airflow attachment is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow attachmentVSAvoiddimple depth precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The dimple depth is varied systematically according to a designed profile (increasing then decreasing) to optimize vortex generation and airflow attachment. This controlled parameter variation achieves reliable airflow control while using standard manufacturing tolerances, as the overall dimple geometry remains within manufacturable limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The critical vortex-generating function is extracted and concentrated in the dimple region, allowing the rest of the airfoil surface to remain simple and easy to manufacture. The depth variation is localized to specific dimples rather than the entire surface, reducing the overall manufacturing precision requirements while maintaining airflow attachment reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dimpled airfoils delay boundary layer separation, resulting in reduced pressure losses, increased torque, and improved overall efficiency of the gas turbine engine compared to conventional designs.

Implementation Method 1

The integration of dimples on the suction side of airfoils, which generate vortices by increasing and then decreasing in depth along the stream-wise direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex generation: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

counteracting laminar separation and maintaining airflow attachment for a longer distance, thereby reducing boundary layer growth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoundary layer control: Boundary Layer

Data Source

PatentUS11933193B2Turbine engine with an airfoil having a set of dimples
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 GE AVIO SRL
  • US11933193B2 patent drawing
  • US11933193B2 patent drawing
  • US11933193B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gas turbine engine comprising a set of circumferentially adjacent airfoils, the airfoils having an outer wall defining a pressure side and a suction side extending between a leading edge and a trailing edge to define a stream-wise direction, and between a root and a tip to define a span-wise direction, and a set of dimples provide on the outer wall of at least one of the airfoils, the set of dimples spaced in at least one of the stream-wise or span-wise directions.