Turbine Blade Aerodynamic Profile Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbine blades in gas turbines face challenges in achieving optimal aerodynamic efficiency and mechanical stress distribution, leading to turbulence and premature wear, particularly in the fifth stage of a turbojet engine's turbine, where existing profiles fail to effectively manage airflow and dynamic loading.

Innovation Solution

An optimized aerodynamic profile for turbine blades is defined using Cartesian coordinates, which is substantially identical to a nominal profile with slight deviations to accommodate manufacturing tolerances and adapt to temperature variations, ensuring efficient airflow and stress distribution across the blade, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a conventional turbine blade profile is used, then the blade structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but turbulence occurs in the airflow and aerodynamic efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade profile manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely defining the blade profile through specific geometric parameters (coordinates X, Y, Z at different sections). The profile includes detailed dimensional specifications such as the leading edge radius, trailing edge thickness, and camber line coordinates that optimize airflow characteristics while maintaining manufacturability through standardized measurement and control methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If the blade profile is optimized for aerodynamic efficiency, then turbulence is reduced and energy loss decreases, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidprofile dimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the blade profile into multiple control sections with specific coordinate points (e.g., sections at 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% of the blade height). Each section has defined geometric parameters that can be manufactured and measured independently, allowing progressive quality control and reducing the overall manufacturing precision burden while maintaining aerodynamic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical profile definition with a mathematical coordinate system approach. The blade geometry is defined by Cartesian coordinates (X, Y, Z) and parametric equations that can be directly translated into CNC machining paths and quality inspection procedures, substituting manual geometric construction with precision mathematical modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Duration of action of stationary object

If the blade profile is optimized for stress distribution, then mechanical durability improves, but aerodynamic performance may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade service lifeVSAvoidturbine efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by defining different geometric characteristics at different locations along the blade height. The profile includes section-specific parameters such as varying camber, thickness distribution, and curvature radii that are optimized for both stress distribution and aerodynamic flow at each local position, rather than using a uniform profile throughout the blade length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized profile improves aerodynamic efficiency by minimizing turbulence and effectively distributing mechanical stresses, leading to improved performance and extended lifespan of turbine blades, even under high dynamic loading conditions.

Implementation Method 1

the flow of air around the profile is sound, i.e. substantially such that it does not give rise to turbulence, which is harmful for overall efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS10287888B2Optimized aerodynamic profile for a turbine blade, in particular for a rotary wheel of the fifth stage of a turbine
Publication Date: 2019.05.14 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US10287888B2 patent drawing
  • US10287888B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When cold and in the non-coated state, the aerodynamic profile is substantially identical to a nominal profile determined by the Cartesian coordinates X,Y, Zadim given in Table 1, in which the coordinate Zadim is the quotient D/H where D is the distance of the point under consideration from a first reference plane P0 situated at the base of the nominal profile, and H is the height of said profile measured from the first reference plane to a second reference plane P1. The measurements D and H are taken radially relative to the axis of the turbine, while the X coordinate is measured in the axial direction of the turbine.