Turbine Blade Aerodynamic Profile Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current turbine blade designs face challenges in achieving optimal aerodynamic efficiency and mechanical stress distribution, leading to turbulence and premature wear, especially under high temperature gradients and dynamic loading conditions.

Innovation Solution

An aerodynamic profile for a turbine blade is developed, defined by specific Cartesian coordinates that ensure minimal turbulence and efficient energy conversion, with slight deviations to accommodate manufacturing tolerances and adapt to flow conditions, allowing for reliable and cost-effective manufacturing and installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a conventional turbine blade profile is used, then manufacturing is simpler, but aerodynamic efficiency deteriorates due to turbulence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidprofile complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely defining the aerodynamic profile through specific Cartesian coordinates (X, Y, Z) that optimize the blade geometry. The profile is defined by a series of coordinate points that control the shape parameters, allowing optimization of aerodynamic performance while maintaining manufacturability through standardized coordinate systems and tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the blade profile is optimized for aerodynamics, then energy conversion improves, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy conversion efficiencyVSAvoidprofile precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent defines the optimized profile using a coordinate system with specified tolerances (±1 mm in the normal direction, ±5% in X,Y coordinates). This approach allows achieving high aerodynamic performance while establishing realistic manufacturing precision requirements that can be met with available manufacturing methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies that the profile may depart very slightly from the nominal profile within defined envelopes, recognizing that perfect precision is unnecessary. This partial action principle allows manufacturing within tolerance bands that still achieve the desired aerodynamic performance without requiring excessive precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Power

If the blade operates under high temperature gradients, then power generation increases, but blade durability decreases due to thermal stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower generationVSAvoidblade durability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses thermal stress by optimizing the local geometry of the blade profile at different positions. The coordinate definition allows different sections of the blade to have optimized shapes that distribute thermal stresses more uniformly, with specific attention to the aerodynamic surface geometry that affects heat transfer patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent defines the blade profile in a cold, non-coated state as a preliminary design step before considering thermal coatings and operating conditions. This preliminary geometric optimization establishes a base profile that, when combined with thermal coatings, will withstand high temperature gradients during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of energy

If the blade profile is highly optimized, then turbulence is reduced, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturbulence reductionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent recognizes that perfect aerodynamic optimization is unnecessary and defines acceptable tolerance envelopes (±1 mm normal direction, ±5% in planar coordinates). This partial optimization approach achieves sufficient turbulence reduction while maintaining compatibility with standard manufacturing methods and cost-effective production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized aerodynamic profile enhances turbine efficiency by reducing turbulence and mechanical stress, improving the blade's ability to withstand dynamic loading and temperature variations, leading to prolonged operation and reduced maintenance costs.

Implementation Method 1

the flow of air around the profile is sound, i.e. substantially such that it does not give rise to turbulence, which is harmful for overall efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

the profile serves to optimize the inter-blade flow, i.e. the flow between adjacent blades of the wheel, and thus transforms a maximum amount of the kinetic energy of the gaseous fluid into kinetic energy on the shaft of the turbine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic force: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS10329914B2Optimized aerodynamic profile for a turbine blade, in particular for a rotary wheel of the sixth stage of a turbine
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US10329914B2 patent drawing
  • US10329914B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When cold and in the non-coated state, the aerodynamic profile is substantially identical to a nominal profile determined by the Cartesian coordinates X, Y, Zadim given in Table 1, in which the coordinate Zadim is the quotient D/H where D is the distance of the point under consideration from a first reference plane P0 situated at the base of the nominal profile, and H is the height of said profile measured from the first reference plane to a second reference plane P1. The measurements D and H are taken radially relative to the axis of the turbine, while the X coordinate is measured in the axial direction of the turbine.