Turbine Blade Aerodynamic Profile Geometry Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbine blades in high-pressure gas turbines face challenges in achieving optimal aerodynamic and mechanical performance due to turbulence, mechanical stress, and thermal integrity, particularly in aircraft turbojets, where efficiency and cooling are critical.

Innovation Solution

An optimized aerodynamic profile for turbine blades is defined using rectangular coordinates, with slight deviations from a nominal profile to accommodate manufacturing tolerances and temperature variations, ensuring efficient air flow and mechanical durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the aerodynamic profile is optimized for minimal turbulence, then aerodynamic efficiency is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidprofile geometry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the aerodynamic profile geometry parameters (curvature radii, chord lengths, thickness distributions) to achieve optimal flow characteristics. The profile incorporates specific geometric parameters that minimize turbulence while remaining manufacturable, balancing aerodynamic efficiency with manufacturing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the profile geometry is highly optimized for aerodynamic performance, then turbulence is reduced, but ease of manufacture decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveturbulenceVSAvoidprofile fabrication ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by optimizing specific local regions of the profile (leading edge curvature, trailing edge geometry, thickness distribution at critical sections) while maintaining simpler geometries in less critical areas. This allows turbulence reduction at key locations without requiring complex manufacturing throughout the entire profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the profile is designed for high mechanical stress resistance, then blade strength is improved, but aerodynamic efficiency may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade strengthVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining the aerodynamic profile with a cooling circuit structure integrated into the blade. This composite design allows the profile to maintain optimized aerodynamic geometry while the internal cooling structure provides mechanical strength and thermal management, resolving the conflict between aerodynamic efficiency and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Temperature

If a cooling circuit is implanted in the blade, then thermal integrity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal integrityVSAvoidblade structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the nested doll principle by integrating the cooling circuit within the internal structure of the blade profile. The cooling channels are nested inside the blade thickness, allowing thermal management functionality to be incorporated without significantly increasing the external profile complexity or aerodynamic drag.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS7785075B2Optimized aerodynamic profile for a turbine blade
Publication Date: 2010.08.31 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US7785075B2 patent drawing
  • US7785075B2 patent drawing
  • US7785075B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When cold and in the non-coated state, the aerodynamic profile is substantially identical to a nominal profile determined by the rectangular coordinates X,Y,Z′ given in Table 1, in which the X coordinate is measured in the axial direction of the turbine, and the Z′ coordinate is the quotient D/H, where D is the distance of the point in question from a reference plane P0 situated at the base of the nominal profile and H is the height of the profile measured from said reference plane to the tip of the blade, the measurements D and H being taken radially relative to the axis of the turbine.