Aircraft Turbine Casing Ovalization Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing manufacturing processes for aircraft turbomachine fan casings, particularly those made of composite materials, suffer from deformation issues such as ovalization during extraction from the mold and subsequent machining and bonding stages, leading to assembly, manufacturing, mechanical, and aerodynamic problems.

Innovation Solution

A method involving two annular shaping rings placed inside the casing during the bonding operation of the abradable layer, which applies heat and pressure to maintain the nominal geometry, allowing for precise shaping and preventing ovalization without cluttering the interior space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If composite material manufacturing process is used, then weight is reduced and mechanical resistance is improved, but deformation and ovalization occur during extraction and subsequent operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasing weightVSAvoidgeometric precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-heating and pre-compressing the casing in the mold before extraction to reduce residual stresses and minimize deformation. The shaping tools are also positioned in advance to maintain geometry during subsequent operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary anti-action by applying counter-forces through shaping tools during bonding operations to prevent ovalization. The compression system applies radial pressure to counteract the tendency of the casing to deform during abradable layer bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Manufacturing precision

If shaping tools are added to prevent ovalization, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric precisionVSAvoidtooling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the shaping tool into multiple independent elements: shaping tools positioned in the mold, and additional shaping tools positioned inside the casing during bonding. This segmentation allows each tool to perform a specific function while maintaining overall simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary compression system that applies radial pressure through the casing wall during bonding operations. This intermediary mechanism transfers force from the bonding system to the casing to maintain geometry without requiring complex internal tooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple shaping operations are performed, then manufacturing precision is improved, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric precisionVSAvoidproduction rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple shaping operations by integrating the shaping function into the existing bonding process. The shaping tools are positioned and activated during the bonding operation itself, combining geometry maintenance with the necessary heating and compression steps rather than requiring separate operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively limits ovalization during the manufacturing process, simplifying machining and assembly, enhancing mechanical and aerodynamic performance, and reducing overall cycle time by maintaining the nominal geometry without the need for custom adaptations.

Implementation Method 1

The resin is polymerized by keeping the two half-shells closed. Depending on the desired production rate, polymerization is carried out at room temperature or by heating.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

during which the casing is heated and compressed by means of a system present at least partly inside the casing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

during which the casing is heated and compressed by means of a system present at least partly inside the casing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3999722B1Method for producing a casing for an aircraft turbine engine
Publication Date: 2024.02.21 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • EP3999722B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3999722B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3999722B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

Method for producing a casing (3) for an aircraft turbine engine, said casing comprising an annular shell (9) extending about an axis A and made of a composite material, an annular layer (4) comprising an abradable material arranged inside the shell and covering a first internal annular surface (9bb) of an intermediate section (9ab), the method comprising a step of bonding the layer to the first surface, in which the casing is heated and compressed by means of a system present at least in part inside the casing, the method being characterised in that, before the casing is heated and compressed, a shaping tool (10) is mounted inside the casing and consists of two rings (12, 14).