Additive-Manufactured Turbine Engine Ducts for Complex Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbine engine duct assemblies face limitations due to manufacturing constraints, leading to increased weight and inefficiency, particularly in accommodating complex geometries and dynamic thermal loading requirements.

Innovation Solution

The use of metal tubular elements with varying wall thickness and cross-sections, formed through additive manufacturing, allowing for localized mechanical and thermal properties, and incorporating tight bends and unique profiles to enhance flexibility and strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If traditional manufacturing methods are used for duct assemblies, then manufacturing capability and cost are limited, but weight increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduct assembly weightVSAvoidmanufacturing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from traditional subtractive or formable manufacturing methods to additive manufacturing. This enables the creation of complex geometries with varying wall thicknesses and cross-sections that cannot be achieved with conventional methods, directly reducing weight while improving manufacturability of complex shapes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes composite material approaches by creating duct assemblies with non-uniform wall thickness distributions and varying cross-sectional profiles. These variations allow optimization of material placement to achieve required structural integrity with minimum weight, while the additive manufacturing process enables complex internal geometries that function as integrated structural-thermal management systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If duct assemblies are designed with complex geometries to accommodate engine components, then spacing requirements are met, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduct geometry flexibilityVSAvoidduct assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter changes by utilizing additive manufacturing to create ducts with continuously varying geometries, including non-uniform wall thicknesses and complex cross-sectional profiles. This allows the duct to adapt to tight spacing requirements and accommodate various engine components while the single-step manufacturing process avoids the complexity of assembling multiple simple components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple functional requirements into a single integrated duct structure. By combining varying wall thickness regions, different cross-sectional profiles, and complex routing paths into one monolithic additive-manufactured component, the design achieves high adaptability to engine layouts without increasing overall device complexity through assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If uniform wall thickness is used in ducts, then manufacturing is simpler, but localized mechanical and thermal properties cannot be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating ducts with non-uniform wall thicknesses and varying cross-sectional profiles tailored to specific locations. Thicker walls are placed in regions requiring higher structural integrity or thermal resistance, while thinner walls are used where loads are lower, optimizing both strength and thermal performance. The additive manufacturing process enables this localized property variation without complicating production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying wall thickness and cross-sectional dimensions along the duct length based on local mechanical and thermal requirements. This allows optimization of structural integrity in high-stress regions while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through a single additive manufacturing process that inherently accommodates geometric variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10948108B2Turbine engine duct
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 UNISON INDUSTRIES LLC
  • US10948108B2 patent drawing
  • US10948108B2 patent drawing
  • US10948108B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A duct for a turbine engine, such as a gas turbine engine, can be utilized to carry a fluid from one portion of the engine to another. The duct can include a metallic tubular element having one of a varying wall thickness, a varying cross section, or a tight bend. Such a duct can be formed utilizing additive manufacturing or metal deposition on an additively manufactured mandrel.