Turbine Component Greenbody Assembly and Sintering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for forming combustion turbine components, such as casting and forging, face limitations in size and surface feature complexity, leading to difficulties in achieving desired shapes and enhanced heat transfer capabilities, and existing joining techniques like friction stir welding and brazing may not provide strong enough bonds or suitable surface features for high-performance applications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the assembly of metallic combustion turbine subcomponent greenbodies using direct metal fabrication, followed by sintering to form a strong bond, which allows for the creation of components with increased surface area and enhanced heat dissipation properties through the use of activatable binders and materials like oxide dispersion strengthened alloys and refractory metals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If casting is used to form combustion turbine components, then complex shapes can be formed, but limitations exist on component size and surface feature dimensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex shapeVSAvoidsurface feature dimension
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The component is divided into multiple subcomponents that are formed separately using greenbody technology, then joined together using friction stir welding. This segmentation allows each subcomponent to be optimized for specific manufacturing requirements while overcoming the size and feature limitations of single-piece casting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If forging is used to form combustion turbine components, then strong bonds and fine grain structure are achieved, but resistance to creep is reduced and small surface features are difficult to form

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebond strengthVSAvoidcreep resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The greenbody components undergo controlled sintering and heat treatment processes that transform the microstructure to achieve both fine grain structure for strength and appropriate grain size for creep resistance. The friction stir welding process also modifies the microstructure at the joint to enhance both strength and high-temperature performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional joining methods like friction stir welding or brazing are used to assemble subcomponents, then components can be formed by conventional processes, but the bonds may not be strong enough or suitable surface features cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing feasibilityVSAvoidjoint strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces conventional mechanical joining methods with a specialized friction stir welding process that creates metallurgical bonds. This process substitutes the limitations of mechanical fastening or brazing with a welding mechanism that produces stronger, more reliable joints capable of withstanding high-temperature turbine environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the formation of combustion turbine components with improved tolerance, shrinkage control, and strength, along with increased surface area for enhanced heat dissipation, overcoming the limitations of traditional methods and providing high-temperature resistance.

Implementation Method 1

assembling a plurality of metallic combustion turbine subcomponent greenbodies to form a metallic greenbody assembly and sintering the metallic greenbody assembly to thereby form the combustion turbine component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentEP2291254B1Method of making a combustion turbine component from metallic combustion turbine subcomponent greenbodies
Publication Date: 2014.02.12 SIEMENS ENERGY INC
  • EP2291254B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2291254B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2291254B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of making a combustion turbine component includes assembling a plurality of metallic combustion turbine subcomponent greenbodies together to form a metallic greenbody assembly and sintering the metallic greenbody assembly to thereby form the combustion turbine component. Each of the plurality of metallic combustion turbine subcomponent greenbodies may be formed by direct metal fabrication (DMF). In addition, each of plurality of metallic combustion turbine subcomponent greenbodies may include an activatable binder and the activatable binder may be activated prior to sintering.