Turbine Lubrication Backflow for Starvation-Intolerant Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lubrication systems in aircraft gas turbine engines often lead to lubricant starvation in components with varying tolerance levels, causing significant damage or operational failure in components intolerant to starvation, as maneuvers or system failures impair lubricant delivery.

Innovation Solution

A multi-branch lubrication system with a primary branch tolerant to starvation and a secondary branch intolerant to starvation, featuring a main pump, lubricant distributor, and an auxiliary pump in the secondary branch that enables backflow from the primary branch to ensure minimum lubrication requirements are met during inadequate lubricant supply.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional parallel branch lubrication system is used, then the system can supply lubricant to multiple components simultaneously, but lubricant starvation occurs in starvation-intolerant components during aircraft maneuvers or system failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelubrication supply reliabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between normal mode (both pumps off, relying on gravity and pressure differential) and backup mode (auxiliary pump activated). The auxiliary pump in the starvation-intolerant branch creates reverse flow to divert lubricant when starvation is detected, transforming a static parallel system into a dynamic one that adapts to lubrication needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different lubrication strategies to different branches: the starvation-tolerant branch operates passively with gravity-fed flow, while the starvation-intolerant branch has an active auxiliary pump. This local differentiation allows the system to prioritize critical components without over-engineering the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If lubricant is diverted to starvation-intolerant components during inadequate supply, then those components are protected from damage, but starvation-tolerant components may experience increased starvation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent operational integrityVSAvoidlubricant starvation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful effect of lubricant starvation in the tolerant branch into a beneficial feature by designing that branch to be intentionally starvation-tolerant. The auxiliary pump in the intolerant branch creates reverse flow that deliberately reduces flow to the tolerant branch, transforming potential damage into an acceptable trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The lubrication system is segmented into two distinct branches with different starvation tolerance characteristics. This segmentation allows independent control and protection strategies for each branch, enabling the system to sacrifice the tolerant branch to protect the intolerant branch during inadequate supply conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If an auxiliary pump is added to the starvation-intolerant branch, then lubricant can be backflowed to protect critical components, but the device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelubrication delivery assuranceVSAvoidpump system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The auxiliary pump is strategically placed in the starvation-intolerant branch to create self-service protection. When lubricant flow becomes inadequate, the auxiliary pump automatically activates to generate reverse flow and divert lubricant to the critical branch, enabling the system to self-correct without external intervention or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses hydraulic principles to achieve lubricant diversion. The auxiliary pump creates pressure differential that drives reverse flow through the distribution manifold, utilizing fluid mechanics to redirect lubricant from the tolerant branch to the intolerant branch without requiring mechanical valves or complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures continued lubrication to starvation-intolerant components by redirecting lubricant from the tolerant primary branch to the intolerant secondary branch during backup mode, preventing damage and maintaining operational integrity.

Implementation Method 1

an auxiliary pump in the second branch downstream of the distributor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPump: Pump

Data Source

PatentUS8424646B2Interruption tolerant lubrication system
Publication Date: 2013.04.23 RTX CORP
  • US8424646B2 patent drawing
  • US8424646B2 patent drawing
  • US8424646B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lubrication system for a turbine engine or other application includes a first or primary branch 12 and a second or secondary branch 14, a main pump 16, a lubricant distributor 18 for receiving lubricant from the main pump and distributing the lubricant to the branches, and a auxiliary pump 30 in the second branch downstream of the distributor. The system is operable in a normal mode of operation in which lubricant flows from a lubricant source into the primary and secondary branches 12, 14 and is also operable in a backup mode of operation in which lubricant backflows from the primary branch into the secondary branch.