Automated Turbine Maintenance Financial Reporting System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for generating turbine maintenance schedules in power plants are time-consuming and costly, relying on manual calculations and condition-based predictions, which can lead to incorrect part replacement and unanticipated shutdowns due to errors in data entry and complex algorithms.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that automatically generate a financial report for turbine maintenance events by analyzing operational history, inspection data, replacement part costs, repair costs, and vendor service costs, using a database and network-based system to provide a pre-determined operational forecast and schedule maintenance events and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual calculations and condition-based prediction are used to generate maintenance schedules, then the system can provide customized maintenance planning, but the process becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomized maintenance planningVSAvoidtime-consuming data entry and calculation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically collecting operational data from plant systems and generating maintenance schedules without requiring manual data entry. The automated algorithm processes operational hours, part lifecycles, and maintenance criteria to produce maintenance schedules independently, eliminating the time-consuming manual calculation process while maintaining customized planning capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual calculation process with an automated computational system. Instead of operators manually entering data and performing calculations, the system uses automated algorithms to process operational data, calculate part lifecycles, and generate maintenance schedules, significantly reducing time consumption and human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual data entry is used to input inspection data into the algorithm, then the system can process condition-based information, but errors increase and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondition-based prediction capabilityVSAvoidaccuracy of maintenance scheduling
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically collects operational data directly from plant monitoring systems and inspection databases, eliminating manual data entry. This self-service approach ensures data accuracy by reducing human intervention while maintaining the system's ability to process condition-based information for maintenance predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where operational data from plant systems continuously updates the maintenance scheduling algorithm. This feedback loop ensures that the most current operational hours, part conditions, and lifecycle data are used for generating accurate maintenance schedules, improving reliability through continuous data validation and updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If complex algorithms are used to determine operating conditions and part lifecycles, then the maintenance planning can be comprehensive, but the computational complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of maintenance planningVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex maintenance planning algorithm is segmented into distinct functional modules: operational data collection, part lifecycle calculation, maintenance criteria evaluation, and schedule generation. Each module handles a specific aspect of the planning process independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive maintenance planning capabilities through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8744864B2Methods and systems for generating a financial report
Publication Date: 2014.06.03 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US8744864B2 patent drawing
  • US8744864B2 patent drawing
  • US8744864B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for generating a financial report indicative of estimated turbine maintenance costs is provided. The method includes receiving, at a database, turbine operational history data and turbine inspection data from a user for a pre-identified turbine, receiving, at the database, turbine replacement part costs, turbine part repair costs, and vendor service costs associated with the pre-identified turbine, inputting a pre-determined turbine operational forecast into the database, analyzing turbine maintenance information including at least one of turbine operational history data, turbine inspection data, replacement part costs, part repair costs, vendor service costs, and turbine operational forecast, and automatically generating a financial report including at least one schedule of turbine maintenance events and costs associated with each event based on the turbine maintenance information analysis.