High-Speed Turbine Shaft Rating for Bending Mode Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbine engines with higher bypass ratios face instability due to reduced stiffness-to-weight ratio and increased excitation of bending modes, leading to excessive vibrations and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Optimized shaft designs and materials, such as ceramic matrix composites, combined with additive manufacturing, to enhance shaft stability and reduce vibrations, allowing for higher redline speeds and improved efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If higher bypass ratios are used to improve engine efficiency, then fuel efficiency improves, but shaft stability deteriorates due to reduced stiffness-to-weight ratio and increased bending mode excitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidshaft stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the shaft's physical properties through material substitution (ceramic matrix composites replacing traditional metals) and geometric optimization (additive manufacturing enabling complex cross-sectional profiles). These parameter changes increase the stiffness-to-weight ratio, allowing higher bypass ratios to be used without compromising shaft stability despite reduced material density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent directly implements composite materials by using ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) for the high-speed shaft. CMCs provide superior specific stiffness compared to traditional metallic materials, enabling the shaft to maintain stability at higher bypass ratios where conventional materials would exhibit excessive bending mode excitation and vibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional metallic materials are used for shafts, then manufacturing is easier, but shaft stability and vibration resistance are insufficient at high bypass ratios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing easeVSAvoidvibration resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional metallic materials to ceramic matrix composites, accepting increased manufacturing complexity in exchange for dramatically improved vibration resistance and shaft stability. The composite material structure provides superior specific stiffness that metallic materials cannot achieve, enabling stable operation at high bypass ratios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality through additive manufacturing, which enables region-specific optimization of the shaft's cross-sectional geometry and material distribution. This allows tailored stiffness characteristics in different sections of the shaft to counteract bending mode excitation locally, improving overall vibration resistance despite the challenges of manufacturing complex composite structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Power

If shaft speed is increased to improve power output, then power increases, but bending mode excitation and vibrations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidvibration level
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the shaft's physical parameters through material substitution and geometric optimization, increasing the stiffness-to-weight ratio. This allows the shaft to operate at higher speeds with reduced bending mode excitation, as the enhanced stiffness counteracts the centrifugal forces and vibrational effects that increase with rotational speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes optimized geometric profiles, potentially including curved or non-circular cross-sections enabled by additive manufacturing, to improve the shaft's torsional and bending stiffness characteristics. These geometric optimizations help suppress bending mode excitation at high rotational speeds while maintaining acceptable vibration levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS12486819B1High-speed shaft rating for turbine engines
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US12486819B1 patent drawing
  • US12486819B1 patent drawing
  • US12486819B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A turbomachine engine includes an engine core including a high-pressure compressor, a high-pressure turbine, and a combustion chamber in flow communication with the high-pressure compressor and the high-pressure turbine. The engine core has a length (LCORE), and the high-pressure compressor has an exit stage diameter (DCORE). A high-pressure shaft is coupled to the high-pressure compressor and the high-pressure turbine. The high-pressure shaft is characterized by a high-speed shaft rating (HSR) from 1.5 to 6.2, and a ratio of LCORE/DCORE is from 2.1 to 4.3.