Turbine Stator Sector Assembly With Robotic Sealing Pad Insertion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual assembly of turbine stators in aeronautical turbomachines is time-consuming and prone to errors, leading to musculoskeletal disorders and reduced quality due to repetitive tasks involved in inserting sealing pads and anti-wear devices, which complicates the assembly process and increases production costs.

Innovation Solution

An automated installation system that pre-assembles turbine stators using robot arms to convey, identify, clean, grease, and insert sealing pads into sectors, and position them on trays, significantly reducing operator intervention and increasing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual assembly methods are used for turbine stators, then operators can perform assembly tasks with flexibility, but assembly time is excessive (ten hours) and quality is reduced due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly timeVSAvoidassembly quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical assembly operations with an automated robotic system. Robot arms equipped with specialized end effectors perform the insertion of sealing pads and anti-wear devices, eliminating human manual labor. This substitution achieves both reduced assembly time (from ten hours to automated cycle time) and improved precision through consistent robotic positioning and insertion forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated assembly system performs all assembly operations autonomously without continuous human intervention. The robot arms self-coordinate to position sectors, insert sealing pads, install anti-wear devices, and secure components. The system serves itself by automatically completing the entire assembly sequence, thereby eliminating the contradiction between manual flexibility and automated efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If operators perform repetitive manual tasks for inserting sealing pads and anti-wear devices, then assembly can be completed, but operators suffer from musculoskeletal disorders and quality decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator workloadVSAvoidassembly quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces repetitive manual operations with automated robotic arms that perform insertion tasks. The robot systems eliminate operator exposure to repetitive strain by completely taking over the insertion of sealing pads and anti-wear devices. This substitution simultaneously improves ease of operation (operators are freed from repetitive tasks) and reliability (consistent robotic precision eliminates human error).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated robot arms are used for assembly, then assembly time is reduced and quality is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated assembly system is divided into distinct functional modules: robot arms for sector handling, separate end effectors for sealing pad insertion and anti-wear device installation, individual positioning systems, and dedicated control units. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together as an integrated system, achieving high productivity despite the inherent complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Extent of automation

If multiple robot arms are deployed for different assembly tasks, then assembly operations are automated and efficient, but the number of components and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidnumber of robot arms
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot arms in the system are designed with multi-functionality, capable of performing multiple assembly operations including sector positioning, sealing pad insertion, anti-wear device installation, and component securing. This universality reduces the total number of specialized robot arms needed while maintaining high automation levels. Each robot arm can be reconfigured through end effector changes to perform different tasks, thereby reducing system complexity compared to having dedicated single-function robots for each operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11952909B2Installation and method for assembling the turbine stators of a turbine
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US11952909B2 patent drawing
  • US11952909B2 patent drawing
  • US11952909B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An installation for pre-assembling the turbine stators of a turbine each formed of several juxtaposed sectors, includes: an input carriage for conveying sectors intended to form the turbine stators. Each sector includes side faces provided with slots and being associated with a given turbine stator; an output carriage having various trays, each associated with a turbine stator; an automated device for inserting sealing pads configured to interact with a sector conveyed by an automated convey pallet, comprising a robot arm for inserting sealing pads into the slots in a side face of the sector; and another robot arm for gripping a sector equipped with pads from a pallet and depositing it on the tray associated with the turbine stator to pre-assemble the turbine stator.