Turbine Vane Ablative Geometry for Acceptance-Test Erosion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas turbine engines used in life-limited applications often employ less durable materials and simpler designs to reduce costs, making them less defect tolerant and susceptible to erosion or burn through in the turbine nozzle due to combustor instabilities.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates an ablative turbine vane with a convex ablative region on its concave sidewall, which is configured to ablate during acceptance testing, forming an aerodynamic surface and mitigating erosion, thereby maintaining the engine's design life and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If less durable materials and simpler designs are used to reduce manufacturing cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but erosion resistance and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoiderosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing erosion compensation only at specific locations (concave sidewalls and leading edges) where erosion occurs most severely, rather than uniformly across the entire vane. This allows the use of less durable materials overall while protecting critical areas, resolving the contradiction between cost and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates preliminary action by pre-installing ablative material in convex regions that will erode during acceptance testing and early operation. This preliminary erosion protects the underlying vane structure from more severe damage later, allowing the engine to achieve its full design life despite using less durable materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If less durable materials are used to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but defect tolerance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoiddefect tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by incorporating ablative material that acts as a protective buffer during acceptance testing and early operation. This cushioning effect absorbs the impact of defects and minor damage that would otherwise compromise less durable materials, thereby improving defect tolerance without increasing manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Device complexity

If conventional vane geometry is used without erosion compensation, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but erosion damage increases during acceptance testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevane geometry complexityVSAvoiderosion damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by modifying only specific regions of the vane geometry (adding convex ablative regions and accounting for concave sidewall erosion) rather than redesigning the entire vane. This localized approach protects against erosion damage while maintaining overall manufacturing simplicity and avoiding excessive geometric complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs disposable ablative material in convex regions that is intentionally designed to erode away during acceptance testing. This sacrificial material protects the main vane structure from erosion damage at minimal cost, effectively using a cheap, short-living component to protect the more valuable permanent structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of ablative turbine vanes with convex ablative regions effectively offsets damage from acceptance testing, ensuring the gas turbine engine retains its designed mission life and performance without significant additional cost.

Implementation Method 1

The combustion section exhaust gases impinge on the convex ablative region of the ablative turbine vane causing the convex ablative region to ablate to form an aerodynamic surface on the concave sidewall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAblation: Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS12297746B2Erosion compensated vane geometry
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 RTX CORP
  • US12297746B2 patent drawing
  • US12297746B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A turbine vane for use in a gas turbine engine includes an airfoil section having a concave sidewall and a convex sidewall. Both the concave sidewall and convex sidewall extend spanwise between a platform and a radially outward airfoil tip and chordwise between a leading edge and a trailing edge. The concave sidewall includes a convex ablative region.