Turbine Vane Area Ratio and Cooling Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbine engine performance is hindered by complex flow dynamics, including turbulence, laminar flow separation, and vibratory stress, which are difficult to predict and control, especially in high-temperature applications, requiring advanced airfoil geometries that balance efficiency, reliability, and durability.

Innovation Solution

The design of turbine vanes with a high area ratio, featuring a specific geometry that reduces flow separation and vibratory stress by expanding the flow path, utilizing materials like nickel-based alloys and thermal barrier coatings, and incorporating cooling passages to manage temperature and flow efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional airfoil geometry is used in turbine vanes, then manufacturing and design are simpler, but flow separation and turbulence increase, reducing thermodynamic efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidairfoil geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the airfoil geometry parameters including the area ratio (ratio of trailing edge chord to leading edge chord), camber distribution, and thickness profile. These parameter changes optimize the flow characteristics to reduce separation and turbulence while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through controlled geometric variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes curvature principles by designing the airfoil with optimized camber lines and curved surfaces that guide flow smoothly. The specific curvature distribution of the suction and pressure surfaces, along with the rounded trailing edge geometry, reduces flow separation and turbulence compared to traditional straight-edged or less curved airfoil designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Power

If turbine vanes operate in high-temperature combustion gases, then energy extraction is improved, but thermal stress and material degradation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy extractionVSAvoidmaterial durability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite material structures combining nickel-based superalloys with thermal barrier coatings. This composite approach allows the metal substrate to provide mechanical strength while the ceramic coating layer insulates against thermal stress, enabling operation in high-temperature combustion gases without material degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by implementing thermal barrier coatings and cooling passages specifically in high-temperature exposure zones of the turbine vane. The material properties and cooling features are localized to where thermal stress is highest, while other areas maintain simpler structures, optimizing both heat resistance and overall durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Temperature

If cooling passages are added to turbine vanes, then temperature management is improved, but structural complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal managementVSAvoidvane manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the cooling system into separate functional components: internal cooling passages within the vane structure, external cooling fins or ribs, and thermal barrier coating layers. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and facilitates manufacturing through modular assembly or sequential processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances thermodynamic efficiency, reduces vibratory stress, and improves performance by minimizing flow detachment and turbulence, leading to increased thrust and reduced engine noise and fuel consumption.

Implementation Method 1

reduces flow separation and vibratory stress by expanding the flow path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 2

complex flow dynamics, including turbulence, laminar flow separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 3

utilizing materials like nickel-based alloys and thermal barrier coatings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Implementation Method 4

incorporating cooling passages to manage temperature and flow efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 5

to generate lift and extract rotational energy from expanding combustion gas in the turbine section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLift: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentEP2518272B1Gas turbine engine
Publication Date: 2022.05.04 MTU AERO ENGINES GMBH
  • EP2518272B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2518272B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2518272B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A vane (34) for a turbine engine comprises an airfoil section (60), an inner platform (52) and an outer platform (56). The airfoil section comprises pressure and suction surfaces extending from a leading edge (62) to a trailing edge (64). The inner platform is attached to the airfoil section along an inner flow boundary (54), where the inner flow boundary extends from an upstream inlet region (66) of the vane to a downstream outlet region (68) of the vane. The outer platform is attached to the airfoil section along an outer flow boundary (58), where the outer flow boundary extends from the inlet region to the outlet region. An area ratio of the outlet region to the inlet region is greater than 2.4.