Turbine Vane Assembly Splitter Ring Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vane assembly designs for turbine engines require costly custom fasteners and complex assembly methods, particularly for attaching a splitter ring between vane assemblies, which can be cumbersome and prone to misalignment.

Innovation Solution

An aggregate vane assembly with a core vane assembly and a bypass vane assembly, where the bypass vanes are integrated with the outer band and supported by bosses, eliminating the need for separate fasteners and simplifying the assembly process by using a splitter ring that is integral with the outer band and positioned to guide fluid flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If custom fasteners are used to attach the splitter ring between vane assemblies, then the attachment strength is improved, but the manufacturing cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The splitter ring is merged with the outer band of the bypass vane assembly into a single integral structure. This eliminates the need for separate fasteners and reduces assembly complexity while maintaining the structural strength required for attaching the vane assemblies together.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The outer band serves multiple functions: it provides structural support for the bypass vanes, acts as an attachment mechanism for the splitter ring, and integrates with the core vane assembly. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated fasteners and reduces overall assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If custom fasteners are used to attach the splitter ring, then the attachment reliability is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By combining the splitter ring and outer band into a single integral structure, the number of parts is reduced, eliminating the need for expensive custom fasteners. The integral structure maintains attachment reliability through its unified design while significantly reducing manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The expensive custom fasteners are extracted from the assembly by integrating their function directly into the outer band structure. This eliminates the need for separate fastener components and reduces manufacturing complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If separate fasteners are used for assembly, then the attachment strength is improved, but the assembly time and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidassembly productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The splitter ring and outer band are merged into a single integral structure that can be installed as one unit. This eliminates multiple fastening operations and significantly reduces assembly time while maintaining the required attachment strength through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Manufacturing precision

If custom fasteners and complex assembly methods are used, then the attachment precision is improved, but the assembly difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidassembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The integral structure of the outer band and splitter ring eliminates the need for precise alignment of multiple separate components. The unified design inherently maintains proper alignment while significantly simplifying the assembly process and reducing the skill level required for installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8784050B2Aggregate vane assembly
Publication Date: 2014.07.22 ROLLS ROYCE CORP
  • US8784050B2 patent drawing
  • US8784050B2 patent drawing
  • US8784050B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aggregate vane assembly is disclosed herein. The aggregate vane assembly includes a core vane assembly encircling a central longitudinal axis. The core vane assembly has a plurality of core vanes each extending radially between an inner hub and an outer band. The core vane assembly extends along the central longitudinal axis between a first forward end and a first aft end. The aggregate vane assembly also includes a bypass vane assembly disposed on a radially opposite side of the outer band relative to the plurality of core vanes. The bypass vane assembly includes at least one bypass vane extending radially outward from a platform. The bypass vane assembly extends along the central longitudinal axis between a second forward end and a second aft end. The aggregate vane assembly also includes at least one boss fixed with the outer band and operable to engage the bypass vane assembly proximate to the second forward end.