Turbine Vane Trailing Edge Cutback Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The trailing edge of turbine vanes in gas turbines is structurally vulnerable due to high thermal stress, leading to a high risk of breakage and cracking, as it is the thinnest part of the airfoil and experiences significant stress concentration.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of cutbacks on both the pressure and suction surfaces of the trailing edge, perpendicular to the radial direction, which are optionally connected to extended holes, provides flexibility and alleviates stress concentration, delaying cracking and improving durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the trailing edge is made thin to reduce weight and improve aerodynamic performance, then the aerodynamic efficiency is improved, but the structural strength and resistance to thermal stress deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidtrailing edge strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The trailing edge is segmented by introducing cutbacks that divide the continuous trailing edge structure into separate sections. These cutbacks create discrete segments that can independently deform under thermal stress, preventing stress concentration while maintaining the overall aerodynamic shape. The trailing edge is divided into multiple zones with different flexibility characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutbacks introduce localized structural modifications at specific positions along the trailing edge, creating areas of controlled flexibility. The trailing edge transitions from a uniformly thin structure to one with spatially varying properties - thinner sections for aerodynamic performance and reinforced/segmented sections for stress relief. This local quality change allows the trailing edge to have different mechanical properties at different locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If cooling holes and slots are added to protect from thermal stress, then the thermal resistance is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal stress resistanceVSAvoidcooling structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling structure is segmented into discrete cutback features rather than requiring a dense network of cooling holes and slots throughout the trailing edge. This segmentation approach provides thermal stress relief through structural division rather than through extensive cooling channels, simplifying the manufacturing process while maintaining thermal stress resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential function of thermal stress management from the complex cooling hole/slot system and implements it through simpler cutback geometries. By removing the need for extensive internal cooling channels in the trailing edge region and replacing them with external cutback features, the manufacturing complexity is reduced while the thermal stress protection function is retained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Duration of action of stationary object

If cutbacks are introduced to reduce stress concentration, then the trailing edge durability is improved, but the aerodynamic performance may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrailing edge service lifeVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutbacks are designed with specific dimensional characteristics that localize their stress-relief function to the immediate trailing edge region while minimizing their impact on the broader aerodynamic flow. The cutback depth, width, and positioning are optimized to provide structural benefits without creating significant flow separation or pressure distribution changes that would degrade aerodynamic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cutback geometry parameters (depth, width, angle, positioning) are carefully controlled and optimized to achieve the desired balance between stress relief and aerodynamic performance. By adjusting these parameters, the design achieves sufficient flexibility for stress management while maintaining the aerodynamic shape integrity in the regions most critical for flow attachment and pressure distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10927678B2Turbine vane having improved flexibility
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 DOOSAN HEAVY IND & CONSTR CO LTD
  • US10927678B2 patent drawing
  • US10927678B2 patent drawing
  • US10927678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a turbine vane having an airfoil in a cross section including a leading edge, a trailing edge, and a pressure surface and a suction surface connecting the leading edge and the trailing edge, the airfoil extending radially from a platform part to an end wall, wherein the trailing edge of the airfoil is provided with a cutback cut in a direction radially perpendicular to both the pressure surface and the suction surface.