Turbocharger Diffuser Center Body for Swirl Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radial turbocharger turbines face efficiency losses due to high exit swirl at off-design operating conditions, leading to increased kinetic energy and angle of incidence losses, particularly under transient conditions, due to size constraints and varying swirl angles.

Innovation Solution

A compact turbocharger turbine diffuser design featuring a center body with de-swirl vanes and annular guide vanes that increase the mean diameter of the exhaust gas stream, reducing tangential velocity and angle of attack, and a wastegate system for improved flow diffusion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a traditional conical diffuser design is used, then efficiency is high when dealing with zero or low levels of inlet swirl, but significant separation of the flow and inefficient diffusion occurs when dealing with high inlet swirl

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediffusion efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to varying swirl angles
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The diffuser is segmented into multiple sections with different wall angle configurations. The first section has a first wall angle optimized for low swirl conditions, while the second section has a second wall angle optimized for high swirl conditions. This segmentation allows the diffuser to adapt to varying inlet swirl angles throughout the operating range, preventing flow separation and maintaining diffusion efficiency across all conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If de-swirl vanes with leading edge angle matched to flow swirl angle are used, then swirl management is effective at a small range of operating conditions, but high angle of incidence losses occur at operating conditions not close to the design condition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswirl management effectivenessVSAvoidangle of incidence losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The diffuser employs variable wall angles instead of fixed de-swirl vanes. The first section has a shallower wall angle that adapts to low swirl conditions, while the second section has a steeper wall angle that adapts to high swirl conditions. This dynamic geometric adaptation eliminates the need for fixed-angle vanes, thereby preventing high angle of incidence losses across the full operating range while maintaining effective swirl management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Volume of moving object

If the turbocharger size is reduced to meet package constraints, then installation is feasible, but efficiency losses increase due to insufficient diffuser length for proper diffusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturbocharger sizeVSAvoiddiffusion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The diffuser utilizes the radial dimension by implementing sections with different wall angles at different radial positions. The first section has a first wall angle and the second section has a second wall angle, creating a three-dimensional flow path that maximizes diffusion efficiency within the limited axial space. This dimensional approach allows adequate diffusion length to be achieved within compact turbocharger dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively reduces kinetic energy and angle of incidence losses across a wide range of operating conditions, enhancing efficiency and managing swirling flows within package constraints.

Implementation Method 1

The diffuser is configured to reduce airflow velocity. To accomplish this, the cross-sectional area of the diffuser increases from an upstream end of the diffuser to the downstream end of the diffuser. Because the mass flow rate through the diffuser is constant, this increased cross-sectional area provides for decreased velocity, decreased dynamic pressure, and increased static pressure.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

the presence of the center body increases the mean diameter of the exhaust gas stream. With free vortex flow, the angular momentum of the tangential portion of the flow remains constant, and thus the increase in mean diameter decreases the tangential velocity of the exhaust stream.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAngular momentum conservation: Angular Momentum Conservation

Data Source

PatentEP3061921B1Turbocharger diffuser with center body
Publication Date: 2019.10.23 GARRETT TRANSPORTATION I INC
  • EP3061921B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3061921B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3061921B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A turbocharger turbine having housing walls defining a diffuser. Within the diffuser, a center body (221) is supported by de-swirl vanes (241) extending from the diffuser wall. The center body forms a de-swirl passageway having an increasing mean diameter of flow from an upstream end (225) of the center body to a leading edge (243) of the de-swirl vanes. A trailing edge (245) of the de-swirl vanes is near the downstream end (233) of the center body. Annular-type guide vanes surround the center body within the de-swirl passageway. A wastegate system is configured to vent wastegate flow into the diffuser through injection ports on the de-swirl vanes, annular guide vanes and/or center body.