Turbofan Mounting Rod Frame for Core Distortion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional turbofan gas turbine engine mounting systems suffer from distortion and bending due to inertia and thrust loads, leading to tip clearance loss and reduced efficiency in axial compressors.

Innovation Solution

A mounting system with a front and rear structure, utilizing three pairs of tangentially extending rods that interconnect the bypass duct wall and the core portion, forming a short circuit to transfer inertia-induced loads and reduce distortion and bending.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a cantilever core mounting system is used, then the structure is simple, but the core portion distorts due to inertia loads causing tip clearance loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting system structureVSAvoidtip clearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting system is segmented into multiple discrete rod elements (three pairs of rods) that connect the core portion to the bypass duct wall. This segmentation allows each rod to independently carry specific loads and provides flexibility in distributing inertia loads, thereby reducing core distortion while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting system transitions from a planar cantilever structure to a three-dimensional spatial framework using rods extending in multiple directions (radially, tangentially, and axially). This dimensional change creates a more rigid load-bearing structure that resists core distortion under inertia loads while preserving tip clearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If a rear core mount is used, then the mounting structure is simplified, but the core portion experiences significant bending due to thrust loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting structureVSAvoidcore portion bending
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The rod frame structure provides localized support at specific positions around the core portion (three pairs of rods circumferentially distributed). This local reinforcement strategically addresses thrust load-induced bending without requiring a complete restructuring of the entire mounting system, thus simplifying the overall structure while maintaining core shape stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting system merges multiple functions into a single integrated rod frame structure: supporting the core portion, resisting thrust loads, and preventing bending. This consolidation of functions reduces the number of separate mounting components needed while effectively controlling core portion shape under various loading conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional mounting systems are used, then the design is conventional, but the core portion experiences distortion and bending leading to reduced compressor efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting system designVSAvoidcompressor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The rod frame structure acts as an intermediary element between the core portion and the bypass duct wall, mediating the transmission of loads. This intermediary structure isolates the core portion from direct exposure to inertial and thrust loads, preventing distortion and bending that would otherwise reduce compressor efficiency, while maintaining a manufacturable design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If the thrust line is offset from the thrust reaction plane, then the mounting arrangement is simplified, but the rear mount carries additional moment loads causing carcass bending

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting arrangementVSAvoidcarcass bending resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The rod frame structure is pre-configured to counteract the moment loads generated by the offset thrust line. By establishing this rigid triangular framework before operation, the system proactively resists carcass bending under moment loads, preventing strength degradation without complicating the mounting arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8979491B2Turbofan mounting arrangement
Publication Date: 2015.03.17 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US8979491B2 patent drawing
  • US8979491B2 patent drawing
  • US8979491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gas turbine engine has a rear mounting structure incorporating a mounting apparatus attached to a bypass duct wall with a link device of six rods for transferring core portion related inertia-induced loads, from an inner case of the core portion in a short circuit across an annular bypass air passage to the bypass duct wall.