Turbomachine Component Strain Evaluation Using Replicate Indicators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in monitoring creep and deformation in turbomachine components, particularly turbine blades, due to the need for specialized equipment that requires direct access and precise calibration, making in-situ measurements difficult or impossible.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of passive strain indicators with replicates that allow for the evaluation of component strain while the component remains in service, using a data acquisition device to analyze images or impressions of the indicators, enabling comparison of initial and subsequent conditions without the need for disassembly or direct line of sight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If specialized equipment is used to obtain visual images of strain sensors for creep monitoring, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and difficulty of operation worsen due to requirements for direct line of sight, precise calibration, and extensive disassembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrain measurement precisionVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the copying principle by creating physical replicas of strain indicators that can be removed and analyzed separately from the component. These replicas capture the strain information at specific time points and can be examined using standard equipment without requiring direct access to the component or specialized in-situ measurement systems. This resolves the contradiction by enabling precise strain measurement through copies rather than requiring complex specialized equipment to access the original component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the strain measurement information from the component by creating removable replicas of strain indicators. Instead of requiring specialized equipment to measure the component in place, the strain information is extracted into separate replicas that can be analyzed independently. This extraction approach eliminates the need for complex specialized equipment while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If direct line of sight and access to strain sensors are required for measurement, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation worsens due to space requirements and disassembly needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimension measurement precisionVSAvoidin-situ measurement ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By creating physical replicas of strain indicators, the patent enables measurement without requiring direct line of sight to the original component. The replicas can be removed and examined in accessible locations using standard equipment, eliminating the operational difficulties of in-situ measurement while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The replicas serve as intermediaries that carry strain information from the component to the measurement location. Instead of requiring direct access to the component, the intermediary replicas transfer the strain data to locations where standard measurement equipment can be easily applied, resolving the contradiction between precision and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If strain sensors are configured on components for creep monitoring, then reliability is improved through continuous monitoring capability, but device complexity increases due to sensor installation and calibration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecreep monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses replicas as simplified copies of strain indicators that capture creep information without requiring complex sensor installations. The replicas can be created and analyzed using standard procedures, maintaining reliability for creep monitoring while significantly reducing system complexity compared to installed sensor systems requiring calibration and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP3330692B1Methods for evaluating component strain
Publication Date: 2021.03.31 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP3330692B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5
  • EP3330692B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3330692B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A system and related methods (300, 400) for evaluating a component (10) using a reference feature (40) and a replicate (50) of the reference feature (40). The component (10) has an exterior surface (11) with a reference feature (40) thereon. The method (300, 400) includes determining (310, 410) an initial condition of the reference feature (40), subjecting (320, 332, 420) the component to at least one duty cycle after determining (310, 410) the initial condition, determining (340, 450) a subsequent condition of the reference feature (40) after the at least one duty cycle while the component is in a service position, and forming (312, 330) a replicate of the reference feature (40) while the reference feature is in one of the initial condition or the subsequent condition. One of the initial condition or the subsequent condition may be determined based on the replicate of the reference feature (40).