Turbomachine Component Strain Evaluation Using Replicate Indicators
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing systems face challenges in monitoring creep and deformation in turbomachine components, particularly turbine blades, due to the need for specialized equipment that requires direct access and precise calibration, making in-situ measurements difficult or impossible.
Innovation Solution
A method involving the use of passive strain indicators with replicates that allow for the evaluation of component strain while the component remains in service, using a data acquisition device to analyze images or impressions of the indicators, enabling comparison of initial and subsequent conditions without the need for disassembly or direct line of sight.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If specialized equipment is used to obtain visual images of strain sensors for creep monitoring, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and difficulty of operation worsen due to requirements for direct line of sight, precise calibration, and extensive disassembly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies the copying principle by creating physical replicas of strain indicators that can be removed and analyzed separately from the component. These replicas capture the strain information at specific time points and can be examined using standard equipment without requiring direct access to the component or specialized in-situ measurement systems. This resolves the contradiction by enabling precise strain measurement through copies rather than requiring complex specialized equipment to access the original component.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent extracts the strain measurement information from the component by creating removable replicas of strain indicators. Instead of requiring specialized equipment to measure the component in place, the strain information is extracted into separate replicas that can be analyzed independently. This extraction approach eliminates the need for complex specialized equipment while maintaining measurement precision.
2Measurement precision
If direct line of sight and access to strain sensors are required for measurement, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation worsens due to space requirements and disassembly needs
Solution Approach 1:
By creating physical replicas of strain indicators, the patent enables measurement without requiring direct line of sight to the original component. The replicas can be removed and examined in accessible locations using standard equipment, eliminating the operational difficulties of in-situ measurement while preserving measurement precision.
Solution Approach 2:
The replicas serve as intermediaries that carry strain information from the component to the measurement location. Instead of requiring direct access to the component, the intermediary replicas transfer the strain data to locations where standard measurement equipment can be easily applied, resolving the contradiction between precision and ease of operation.
3Reliability
If strain sensors are configured on components for creep monitoring, then reliability is improved through continuous monitoring capability, but device complexity increases due to sensor installation and calibration requirements
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses replicas as simplified copies of strain indicators that capture creep information without requiring complex sensor installations. The replicas can be created and analyzed using standard procedures, maintaining reliability for creep monitoring while significantly reducing system complexity compared to installed sensor systems requiring calibration and maintenance.
Data Source
Figure 1~5
Figure 3
Figure 4
AI summary
A system and related methods (300, 400) for evaluating a component (10) using a reference feature (40) and a replicate (50) of the reference feature (40). The component (10) has an exterior surface (11) with a reference feature (40) thereon. The method (300, 400) includes determining (310, 410) an initial condition of the reference feature (40), subjecting (320, 332, 420) the component to at least one duty cycle after determining (310, 410) the initial condition, determining (340, 450) a subsequent condition of the reference feature (40) after the at least one duty cycle while the component is in a service position, and forming (312, 330) a replicate of the reference feature (40) while the reference feature is in one of the initial condition or the subsequent condition. One of the initial condition or the subsequent condition may be determined based on the replicate of the reference feature (40).