Predicting Turbulent Flow Separation on Curved Ramps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting turbulent flow separation over curved convex ramps are complex and computationally intensive, lacking a simple and efficient way to determine the onset of separation based on key parameters related to ramp geometry and flow properties.

Innovation Solution

A method using normalized maximum slope and height-to-length ratio of the ramp, along with the Reynolds number of the inflow, to predict incipient separation by calculating a critical ramp slope, allowing for the prediction of flow separation without requiring detailed computational fluid dynamics simulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If computational fluid dynamics simulations are used to predict flow separation, then prediction accuracy is improved, but computational complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential prediction capability from complex CFD simulations by identifying and isolating the key controlling parameters (normalized maximum slope, height-to-length ratio, and Reynolds number). This allows the complex flow separation prediction problem to be reduced to a simple algebraic criterion that captures the essential physics without requiring full computational simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces expensive, computationally intensive CFD simulations with a simple, inexpensive algebraic criterion. The prediction method uses basic geometric parameters and Reynolds number calculations that can be performed instantly without requiring supercomputers or complex numerical codes, making the prediction as cheap as a calculator computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Measurement precision

If detailed computational fluid dynamics simulations are performed, then flow separation prediction is accurate, but the method becomes time-consuming and computationally intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow separation prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential prediction capability from complex CFD simulations by identifying and isolating the key controlling parameters (normalized maximum slope, height-to-length ratio, and Reynolds number). This allows the complex flow separation prediction problem to be reduced to a simple algebraic criterion that captures the essential physics without requiring full computational simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces expensive, computationally intensive CFD simulations with a simple, inexpensive algebraic criterion. The prediction method uses basic geometric parameters and Reynolds number calculations that can be performed instantly without requiring supercomputers or complex numerical codes, making the prediction as cheap as a calculator computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Device complexity

If simple algebraic criteria are used for prediction, then computational complexity is reduced, but prediction accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the complex flow separation problem into a parameter-based prediction by non-dimensionalizing the geometric parameters (creating normalized maximum slope and height-to-length ratio) and expressing the critical condition as a relationship between these parameters and Reynolds number. This parameter transformation simplifies the physics while maintaining predictive accuracy across different flow configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality by focusing on the specific local geometry characteristics (maximum slope, height-to-length ratio) that control flow separation, rather than requiring global flow field information. This localized approach captures the essential physics at the separation point without needing to resolve the entire flow field, maintaining accuracy while simplifying computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces computational complexity, enabling efficient prediction of flow separation over smooth curved ramps, facilitating aerodynamic design by minimizing drag and fuel consumption in aircraft fuselage designs.

Implementation Method 1

Flow separation may occur in a flow having a turbulent boundary layer (TBL) under the effect of adverse pressure gradient (APG). As a TBL develops in space over a curved convex wall, the streamwise average velocity in the boundary layer is reduced by the APG

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdverse pressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

calculating a critical ramp slope (|z'|crit) as a linear function of the height-to-length ratio of the ramp surface... the inflow Reynolds number (ReL) (based on the length of the ramp surface)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReynolds number:

Data Source

PatentUS20230175920A1Predicting incipient separation in turbulent flows
Publication Date: 2023.06.08 UNIV OF WASHINGTON
  • US20230175920A1 patent drawing
  • US20230175920A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for predicting if a flow over a smooth ramp surface will separate from the ramp surface, wherein the ramp surface has a slope that is everywhere non-positive along the length of the ramp surface relative to the flow at the inflow end of the ramp surface includes i) dividing the height of the ramp surface by the length of the ramp surface to determine a height-to-length ratio of the ramp surface, ii) identifying a maximum slope magnitude of the ramp surface, iii) calculating a maximum normalized slope by dividing the maximum slope magnitude of the ramp surface by the height-to-length ratio of the ramp surface, and calculating a critical ramp slope as a linear function of the height-to-length ratio of the ramp surface. If the maximum normalized slope is greater than the critical ramp slope, the method predicts the turbulent boundary layer will separate from the ramp surface.