Turkey Decoy Motion Sensing for Realistic Wildfowl Attraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing decoys for wildfowl do not effectively attract live wildfowl due to their inability to deceive the birds into believing they are another live wildfowl.

Innovation Solution

The development of a turkey decoy system that includes a motion sensor to trigger various activatable components, such as a camera, sound generation, and decoy movement, along with a remote actuator to position the game call at a distance from the hunter, allowing for realistic simulation of wildfowl behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing decoys are used to attract wildfowl, then the decoy structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the decoy cannot effectively attract live wildfowl because it cannot simulate natural behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattractiveness to live wildfowlVSAvoiddecoy system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The decoy system incorporates motion sensors and actuators that enable dynamic movement and behavior simulation. The decoy can automatically perform actions such as preening, walking, and reacting to environmental stimuli, transforming it from a static object to a dynamic simulation of live wildfowl behavior, thereby significantly improving attractiveness to target birds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs motion sensors that automatically detect the presence of target wildfowl and trigger appropriate responses without human intervention. The decoy autonomously performs behaviors such as adjusting its position, displaying plumage, and emitting sounds based on sensor input, enabling self-directed attraction efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If a motion sensor and actuator system are added to the decoy, then the decoy can simulate natural behaviors and sounds, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattractiveness to live wildfowlVSAvoiddecoy system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motion sensor system serves multiple functions: detecting the presence of target birds, determining their approach direction, and triggering appropriate behavioral responses. The actuator system similarly performs multiple tasks including physical movement, plumage adjustment, and sound emission, consolidating several functions into integrated subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates motion sensors that continuously monitor the environment and provide feedback to the control system. Based on this feedback about bird presence and movement, the system adjusts decoy behaviors in real-time, creating a closed-loop response system that adapts to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the game call is positioned close to the hunter, then the operation is simple and direct, but the hunter cannot remain camouflaged or hidden in brush

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehunter camouflage capabilityVSAvoidremote actuation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A remote actuation system serves as an intermediary between the hunter and the game call. This intermediary mechanism allows the hunter to operate the call from a concealed position away from the call itself, maintaining camouflage while still controlling the device through remote activation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system separates the hunter, the game call, and the actuation mechanism into distinct spatial components. The game call is positioned at the decoy location while the actuation mechanism is distributed to allow remote operation, segmenting the system to enable hunter concealment without compromising operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12568957B2Turkey decoy system
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 CAGLE SAMUEL D
  • US12568957B2 patent drawing
  • US12568957B2 patent drawing
  • US12568957B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A turkey decoy system may include a decoy having a silhouette of a wild turkey with a wry tail. A turkey decoy system may include a decoy supporting our housing a motion sensor which triggers or activates at least one activatable member such as a camera, an actuator to activate a turkey call supported by the decoy, and actuator to rotate the decoy and/or an actuator to change a height of the decoy.