Finish Turning FEM Mesh Refinement at the Tool-Workpiece Contact

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Standard finite element method platforms face challenges in machining modeling due to multiple length scales, high strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures, leading to inefficient mesh refinement and increased computational costs, as they often require finer meshes over larger volumes without precise location optimization.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for mesh refinement in finite element analysis that identifies the precise surface location of a tool contacting a workpiece using analytical modeling, maps this location to an external finite element mesh, and performs targeted mesh refinement using a finite element method module, optimizing mesh density only at the contact interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If standard FEM platforms apply finer mesh over larger volumes to ensure accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but computational cost and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of numerical solutionVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by identifying the specific contact region between tool and workpiece and applying mesh refinement only to that localized area. The system calculates the contact region based on tool geometry and machining parameters, then refines the mesh exclusively within this contact zone rather than across the entire model volume, thereby maintaining accuracy where needed while reducing overall computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the mesh refinement process into distinct zones: a refined contact region mesh and a coarser non-contact region mesh. This segmentation allows the system to apply different mesh densities to different spatial regions, optimizing the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency by concentrating computational resources only where physical contact occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If standard FEM platforms apply finer mesh over larger volumes to ensure accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of numerical solutionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system identifies the contact region and applies fine mesh only locally to this specific area rather than globally across the entire model. This localized refinement maintains numerical accuracy at the contact interface while significantly reducing the total number of elements in the model, thereby decreasing processing time while preserving solution accuracy where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The mesh is segmented into contact and non-contact regions with different refinement levels. The contact region receives fine mesh for accuracy, while the non-contact region uses coarser mesh for efficiency, creating a multi-zone mesh structure that optimizes the trade-off between processing time and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If standard FEM platforms apply uniform mesh refinement, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresolution of numerical solutionVSAvoidmesh refinement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements local quality by applying mesh refinement selectively only to the contact region identified through geometric calculations, rather than uniformly across the entire model. This approach maintains high resolution where needed while keeping the overall mesh structure simpler and easier to manage, reducing the complexity of mesh generation and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4220571A1Geometrical calculations for targeted local FEM mesh refinement in finish turning systems and methods
Publication Date: 2023.08.02 RTX CORP
  • EP4220571A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4220571A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4220571A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Systems and methods for mesh refinement of finite element analysis simulations employ an analytical modeling program configured to identify a location of contact (614) between two components and a finite element analysis program configured to use the identified location to perform finite element mesh refinement. In this regard, the location of contact (614) (and location of desired mesh refinement) is identified using analytical modeling. Said location of contact (614) is then provided to the finite element analysis program for determining precisely where to perform mesh refinement on the finite element mesh. The finite element analysis program performs a mesh refinement at the exact location of contact (614) between two components to provide for optimized and more efficient finite element analysis.