Turnoff Recognition Apparatus Using Bayesian Feature Integration
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing techniques for recognizing a turnoff from a roadway are prone to errors due to difficulties in estimating road shape with compound lines and relying on single features, leading to incorrect detection of non-turnoffs as turnoffs.
Innovation Solution
A turnoff recognition apparatus that includes a vehicle-mounted camera and an image processor with modules for extracting white-line candidates, calculating their likelihoods, and determining the presence of a turnoff based on features such as lane line type, parallelism, curvature, and line variation, using a Bayesian inference scheme to integrate multiple features for accurate decision-making.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If a single feature (e.g., parallelism or lane width) is used to detect turnoff, then the detection process is simple, but the accuracy is low and false positives occur
Solution Approach 1:
The detection process is segmented into multiple independent feature extraction modules, each analyzing a specific aspect (parallelism, lane width, curvature, line type). This allows comprehensive analysis while maintaining modular simplicity in each component.
Solution Approach 2:
Multiple feature detection results are merged through integration processing to form a comprehensive turnoff determination. The combination of parallelism variation, lane width change, curvature variation, and line type analysis creates a robust detection system that overcomes the limitations of single-feature methods.
2Measurement precision
If compound lines are used in road markings, then lane guidance is provided, but accurate road shape estimation becomes difficult leading to detection errors
Solution Approach 1:
The system applies different analysis strategies based on local road marking characteristics. When compound lines are detected, the system adjusts its feature extraction to focus on the collective behavior of multiple lines rather than individual lines, maintaining accuracy for both compound and single line configurations.
Solution Approach 2:
The detection algorithm dynamically adjusts its parameters based on the detected road marking type. For compound lines, it modifies the feature extraction parameters to account for multiple parallel lines, while for single lines it uses standard parameters, thus adapting to different road marking configurations.
3Reliability
If multiple features are integrated for turnoff detection, then detection accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements a hierarchical feature analysis where not all features are processed with equal depth. Some features provide strong indicative signals that can trigger or eliminate turnoff detection without requiring full analysis of all features, reducing unnecessary computational effort while maintaining high accuracy.
Data Source
AI summary
An apparatus for determining the presence or absence of a turnoff from a roadway. In the apparatus, a white-line candidate extractor applies image processing to an image of surroundings of a subject vehicle acquired by a vehicle-mounted camera to extract white-line candidates in the roadway. A white-line likelihood calculator calculates, for each of the white-line candidates extracted by the white-line candidate extractor, a likelihood of the white-line candidate. A white-line likelihood calculator calculates, for each of the white-line candidates extracted by the white-line candidate extractor, a likelihood of the white-line candidate. A turnoff determiner calculates a likelihood for one of a plurality of features of the white line selected by the white-line selector, and determines the presence or absence of a turnoff from the roadway based on the likelihood calculated by the turnoff determiner.