Turret Buoy Conical Coupling Load Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing disconnectable turret and buoy assemblies in offshore oil production face challenges in maintaining a secure interface under external loads, requiring excessive machining and potentially leading to premature failure of locking means due to high cyclic load variations.

Innovation Solution

The assembly features an annular projection and recess with specific machining tolerances, allowing for axial compression and radial deformation to create a form-fit, reducing the likelihood of separation and distributing loads effectively, with an optional sealing member for enhanced sealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a conical interface is used to ease fit-up of the turret and buoy, then the assembly of the two structures is simplified, but the conical recess must be fabricated extremely heavy and sturdy to resist radial loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit-up easeVSAvoidconical recess weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The conical interface is segmented into two distinct components: a conical projection on the buoy and a conical recess in the turret. This segmentation allows the fit-up ease to be provided by the conical geometry while the load-bearing function is provided by the tapered surfaces that engage under compression, eliminating the need for an excessively heavy recess structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interface geometry is designed with specific taper angles and dimensional parameters that optimize both fit-up ease and load resistance. The conical surfaces are designed with tolerances that allow for self-aligning during assembly while maintaining sufficient contact area to resist radial loads without requiring excessive material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If high preload is applied to prevent separation of buoy and turret under external loads, then the interface stability is improved, but the locking means are subject to high cyclic load variations and may fail prematurely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface stabilityVSAvoidlocking means reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The conical projection and recess are designed to automatically generate the necessary preload through their geometric engagement. When the buoy is lowered onto the turret, the conical surfaces self-align and create compressive preloading that stabilizes the interface without requiring additional locking mechanisms to maintain the preload, thereby reducing cyclic load variations on locking means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The conical interface acts as an intermediary mechanism that transforms the vertical compression force into radial clamping pressure. This intermediary action distributes the loads more evenly across the interface and reduces the cyclic variations transmitted to the locking means, improving their reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If tight machining tolerances are used to achieve a good fit between turret and buoy interface, then the fit quality is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface fit qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The conical interface design concentrates the precision requirements to specific critical areas of the conical surfaces where contact occurs under load. Non-critical areas can be manufactured with looser tolerances, reducing overall manufacturing cost while maintaining adequate fit quality through the self-aligning conical geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The interface design incorporates optimized taper angles and dimensional parameters that provide a good fit with relaxed tolerances. The conical geometry naturally compensates for minor manufacturing variations through self-aligning during assembly, achieving acceptable fit quality without requiring tight machining tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design ensures a stiff load path and high internal contact stress, preventing separation and allowing the turret and buoy to act as a single structure, while minimizing cyclic loads on locking devices and providing effective sealing against seawater.

Implementation Method 1

under an axial compression force, one of these parts deforms more than the other in a radial direction such as to become compliant with the other part in a form-fit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadial deformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS8387549B2Assembly of turret and disconnectable buoy
Publication Date: 2013.03.05 BLUEWATER ENERGY SERVICES BV (100 00)
  • US8387549B2 patent drawing
  • US8387549B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Assembly of turret and disconnectable buoy, in which the turret at its lower end and the buoy at its upper end are provided with mating coupling provisions. The coupling provisions comprise an annular projection protruding from one of the turret and buoy towards the other of the turret and buoy and a correspondingly shaped annular recess on the other of the turret and buoy for receiving the annular projection. The annular projection has a base which is wider than a top thereof, whereas the annular recess has a top which is wider than a base thereof.