TV Ad Inventory Optimization With Neutral CPO-Based Pricing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for selling remnant TV inventory lack real-time optimization, fail to reflect market value, and rely heavily on manual processes, leading to inefficient matching of inventory with advertiser demands and potential revenue loss.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system using optimization algorithms and AI to balance the interests of TV publishers and advertisers, ensuring impartial data handling and dynamic pricing based on CPO goals and performance estimates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional manual sales methods are used for remnant TV inventory, then the process is simple to implement, but the matching efficiency between inventory and advertiser demands is poor and transaction time is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes (phone calls, in-person negotiations) with an automated computer system that uses algorithms to match inventory with advertiser demands. The system automatically processes bids, evaluates criteria, and executes transactions, eliminating manual intervention while significantly improving matching efficiency and reducing transaction time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service operation where the automated platform independently handles the entire remnant inventory sales process. It automatically receives bids from advertisers, evaluates them against predefined criteria, determines winners, and processes transactions without requiring manual sales team intervention, thereby improving productivity while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If static pricing is used for remnant inventory, then the pricing process is simple, but the pricing does not reflect true market value and revenue is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing accuracyVSAvoidpricing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic pricing that automatically adjusts based on real-time market conditions, bid amounts, and inventory availability. The system continuously monitors market data and modifies prices accordingly, ensuring that remnant inventory is sold at optimal prices that reflect true market value rather than fixed static rates, thereby improving pricing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where bid information and market responses are continuously fed back into the pricing algorithm. This feedback loop enables the pricing system to learn from actual market behavior and adjust future pricing decisions, improving accuracy over time while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If real-time optimization is implemented, then revenue maximization is achieved, but the system requires complex algorithms and continuous processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue optimizationVSAvoidoptimization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing optimization criteria, weightings, and evaluation frameworks before the actual selling process begins. These pre-configured parameters enable the system to automatically execute complex optimization algorithms in real-time without requiring continuous manual adjustment, thereby achieving reliable revenue maximization while managing system complexity through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of information

If neutral platform approach is used to serve both publishers and advertisers, then data confidentiality is maintained, but the system must handle and protect sensitive information from both sides

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata confidentialityVSAvoiddata protection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system acts as a neutral intermediary platform that receives and processes sensitive data from both publishers and advertisers separately. It maintains distinct data streams for each party, using the data only for optimization purposes and then discarding or anonymizing it, thereby protecting confidentiality while enabling informed decision-making. This intermediary role allows the system to handle sensitive information securely without compromising either party's data privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260044876A1Computer-Automated Optimization System for TV Ad Inventory Management
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 DENALI TV
  • US20260044876A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044876A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method and system optimizes television advertising inventory through a neutral platform that benefits both publishers and advertisers. The method includes receiving input data from a television publisher comprising data representing available TV ad inventory and pricing data associated with the available TV ad inventory. The method further includes receiving input data from an advertiser comprising performance estimates for advertising campaigns, Cost Per Outcome (CPO) goals, campaign requirements, flight dates, and placement parameters. The system optimizes placement of the advertising campaigns within the available TV ad inventory based on the input data from the TV publisher and the input data from the advertiser, using a neutral optimization engine that simultaneously balances objectives of maximizing revenue for the TV publisher and minimizing deviations from the CPO goals of the advertiser. The optimization engine calculates hourly unit rates using CPO goals and performance estimates while maintaining confidentiality of sensitive data from both parties. The system creates a more efficient and equitable marketplace for TV advertising by addressing information asymmetry issues that have persisted in the industry.