Twin Baby Carrier Pouch Layout for Balanced Two-Child Carrying

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional child carriers are poorly designed for carrying multiple children, leading to rapid fatigue and discomfort for both adults and children, and fail to support children of different sizes simultaneously in a safe and ergonomic manner.

Innovation Solution

A soft-structured, frameless baby carrier with dual carrier pouches positioned front and back, allowing children to face inward and sit in a straddled position, featuring adjustable waist and shoulder straps to distribute weight evenly and accommodate varying sizes, and optional safety features like a chest strap and safety belt for secure carrying.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional single-child carrier design is used, then the carrier structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but it cannot carry multiple children simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of children carriedVSAvoidcarrier structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier is divided into separate functional modules: a first carrier pouch for one child and a second carrier pouch for another child. Each pouch can be independently adjusted and positioned, allowing the carrier to accommodate multiple children while maintaining manageable structural complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier pouches are designed to serve multiple functions: they can carry children of different sizes, be positioned in different locations (front or back), and be independently adjusted. The shared waist support and shoulder straps provide universal support structures that serve both pouches, reducing overall complexity while enabling multi-child carrying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If multiple-child carriers are designed without proper ergonomic support, then the device complexity is reduced, but rapid fatigue and discomfort occur for both children and adult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort and fatigue reductionVSAvoidsupport structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier provides localized ergonomic support at critical points: each carrier pouch has independent waist support and shoulder strap attachments to distribute weight locally, and the pouches are positioned to align with the wearer's body anatomy. This localized support system reduces fatigue without requiring overly complex global structural changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier incorporates adjustable and flexible elements including independently adjustable waist supports, shoulder straps, and carrier pouches that can adapt to different body types and child sizes. This dynamic adjustability allows the support structure to conform to the wearer and children, enhancing comfort without fixed complex mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If carrier pouches are positioned to allow children to face inward, then safety and bonding are improved, but the carrier structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild safety and securityVSAvoidpouch configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier uses separate carrier pouches for each child that can be independently positioned and oriented. Each pouch is designed to face inward toward the wearer, providing safety and security, while the segmentation allows flexible positioning without requiring a single complex integrated structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier pouches are pre-configured with waist supports and attachment points that facilitate inward-facing positioning. The structural design anticipates the need for secure inward-facing orientation by incorporating appropriate attachment mechanisms and pouch orientations from the outset, simplifying the overall configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If the carrier is designed to accommodate children of different sizes, then versatility is improved, but the adjustment mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of different child sizesVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each carrier pouch has its own independent waist support and shoulder strap attachments that can be adjusted separately. This local adjustability allows each pouch to be customized for different child sizes without requiring complex global adjustment mechanisms, maintaining simplicity while achieving versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier incorporates flexible and adjustable elements including independently adjustable waist supports, shoulder straps, and pouch sizes. These dynamic components can be modified to accommodate different child sizes and configurations, providing versatility without fixed complex adjustment mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9439516B2Ergonomic twin baby carrier
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 WORKMAN KRYSTAL
  • US9439516B2 patent drawing
  • US9439516B2 patent drawing
  • US9439516B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A child carrier for carrying two children of different sizes has a first and second child carrier portions including first and second carrier pouches, respectively, each pouch attached at its bottom to a waist support, and shoulder straps. The first and second child carrier portions are configured to be secured between the shoulder straps and directly opposite one another. At least one of the child carrier pouches is configured to extend behind the shoulder straps, such that a heavy weight in the opposite child carrier pouch that presses the shoulder straps tightly against a wearer does not compress a child therein against the wearer. Each of the child carrier pouches is curved towards a wearer to prevent a child inserted therein from facing away from the wearer and is configured to hold a child in a seated straddle position.