Twin Inference Models for Data Transmission Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data collection systems face high computing resource costs due to the transmission of large data volumes across distributed systems, which can lead to increased energy consumption and reduced availability of resources for other tasks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a multi-stage data reduction process using twin inference models at data aggregators and collectors, where feature relationship inference models identify relationships in collected data, allowing for selective transmission and reconstruction of data at the aggregator, thereby reducing the amount of data transmitted and conserving computing resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all collected data is transmitted to the data aggregator, then data accuracy is maintained, but computing resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential features and relationships from the collected data using inference models, rather than transmitting all raw data. The data collector identifies and transmits only the most relevant data portions that cannot be accurately inferred, while the aggregator reconstructs the complete data set using the transmitted features and inference models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates inference models that copy the essential patterns and relationships of the data at the collector, allowing the aggregator to reconstruct data without receiving all original data. The transmitted data includes copies of only the critical features needed for accurate reconstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Use of energy by moving object

If data transmission volume is reduced, then computing resources are conserved, but data representation accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing resource consumptionVSAvoiddata representation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the data aggregator evaluates the accuracy of reconstructed data and adjusts the data reduction plan accordingly. Error thresholds are monitored and used to refine which features are transmitted versus inferred, ensuring accuracy is maintained while minimizing transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transmits slightly more data than the absolute minimum required, including redundant features that provide error margins for reconstruction. This partial excess ensures that even with compression, the reconstructed data remains within acceptable accuracy thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of energy

If feature relationship inference models are used to reduce data, then transmission costs decrease, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission costVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing function into two distinct parts: the data collector that extracts and transmits only essential features, and the data aggregator that reconstructs complete data using inference models. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces feature relationship inference models as intermediary components that bridge the gap between reduced transmitted data and the original complete data set. These models act as mediators that enable accurate reconstruction without requiring transmission of all original data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230418467A1System and method for reduction of data transmission in dynamic systems using inference model
Publication Date: 2023.12.28 DELL PROD LP
  • US20230418467A1 patent drawing
  • US20230418467A1 patent drawing
  • US20230418467A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for managing data collection are disclosed. A data aggregator may aggregate data collected by a data collector. To reduce computing resources used for aggregation, the data aggregator and data collector may implement a multi-stage data reduction processes to reduce the quantity of data transmitted for data aggregation purposes. The multi-stage data reduction process may include implementing twin inference models at the aggregator and collector, identifying relationships in the data collected by the data collector using feature relationship inference models, transmitting a portion of the collected data to the data aggregator and withholding a second portion of the collected data based on acceptable level of error for use of the collected data, and reconstructing the withheld portion of the collected data at the aggregator. The reconstructed portion of the collected data may include the acceptable level of error when compared to a corresponding portion of the collected data.