Twin-Propeller Thruster Flow Alignment for Stable Marine Turns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing marine vehicles with twin-propeller vector propulsion systems face difficulties in controlling trajectory, particularly during turns, due to inefficiencies in propeller flow dynamics, leading to potential destabilization and increased hydrodynamic drag.

Innovation Solution

A method for piloting marine vehicles using a vector propulsion system with two counter-rotating propellers, adjusting their cyclic and collective pitch angles to control the thrust orientation over 4π steradians, ensuring the flow from one propeller aligns with the center of the other propeller, even during turns, thereby stabilizing the vehicle's trajectory.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional propulsion with control surfaces is used, then the vehicle can be steered by generating fluid flow around control surfaces, but the control surfaces generate significant hydrodynamic drag that consumes energy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the control surfaces from the conventional propulsion system, retaining only the propeller thrust generation capability. By removing the control surfaces that cause drag, the system achieves steering through direct thrust vectoring without the energy-consuming drag penalty of traditional control surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using control surfaces to redirect fluid flow for steering (conventional approach), the invention inverts the approach by directly steering the thrust vector through propeller orientation control. This reversal eliminates the intermediate control surfaces and their associated drag losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Adaptability or versatility

If control surfaces are used for steering, then the vehicle can change direction, but the control surfaces generate drag proportional to the square of speed which opposes movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirectional controlVSAvoidhydrodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the control surfaces from the system entirely, achieving directional control through alternative means (propeller thrust vectoring) that do not generate the harmful drag associated with control surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the propeller thrust, which in conventional systems is purely for propulsion, into a dual-purpose element that provides both propulsion and steering control. This eliminates the need for separate control surfaces and their associated drag.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Ease of operation

If the flow velocity around control surfaces is weak, then the efficiency of control surfaces decreases inversely with the square of flow velocity, but increasing flow velocity requires significant vehicle movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering efficiencyVSAvoidvehicle speed requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of relying on fluid flow around control surfaces for steering (which requires high vehicle speed), the invention inverts the approach by directly controlling the thrust vector orientation through propeller positioning, enabling effective steering even at low or zero vehicle speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The propeller thrust serves both propulsion and steering functions simultaneously. The system uses its own thrust generation capability to achieve directional control without requiring external fluid flow conditions or additional control surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Object-generated harmful factors

If twin-propeller vector propulsion system is used to eliminate control surfaces, then hydrodynamic drag is reduced, but difficulties arise in controlling trajectory particularly when turning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrodynamic dragVSAvoidtrajectory control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs dynamic control of the twin propellers, where each propeller's thrust magnitude and orientation are continuously adjusted based on real-time vehicle state and desired trajectory. This dynamic coordination enables precise trajectory control during turns while maintaining the drag-reduction benefits of having no control surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The trajectory control system uses feedback from vehicle position, orientation, and speed measurements to continuously adjust propeller thrust vectors. This closed-loop control ensures accurate trajectory tracking during maneuvers while exploiting the low-drag configuration of the control-surface-free design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances maneuverability and reduces hydrodynamic drag by eliminating the need for control surfaces, allowing efficient steering and stabilization at various speeds without energy-consuming vortex formation.

Implementation Method 1

a propeller comprising two propellers... the upstream propeller generating a flow directed towards the position of the center of the downstream propeller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust generation: Reaction (physics)

Implementation Method 2

the orientation of the control surfaces causes a modification of the lift generated by the flow of fluid surrounding the control surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLift generation: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 3

the control surfaces generate a drag proportional to the square of the speed which opposes the movement and which therefore consumes energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP3393902B1Marine vehicle thruster control method
Publication Date: 2025.09.17 THALES SA
  • EP3393902B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3393902B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3393902B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for controlling a thruster of a marine vehicle (1) including a body (2) and a thruster (3) mounted on the body (2) of the vehicle (1). The vehicle (1) is at least partially submerged in a liquid, moves, relative to the liquid, along a movement axis (x) in a movement direction, and rotates about at least one axis of rotation perpendicular to the movement axis (x) at a rotational speed. The thruster (3) includes an upstream propeller and a downstream propeller along the movement axis in the movement direction. The method includes a stabilization step, during which the thruster is controlled such that the main axis of the upstream flow generated by the upstream propeller at a given time t is an estimated main axis on which a position (P) of a center of the downstream propeller, substantially located on the axis of rotation of the downstream propeller, is estimated to be located at a later time t+dt, at which the flow generated by the upstream propeller at the given time t reaches the downstream propeller. The estimated main axis (xe) depends on the rotational speed of the vehicle.