Twin-Seq DNA Sequencing for Somatic Mutation Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for quantifying somatic mutations across a cellular population are challenging due to the low number of mutations per cell and the high fidelity of DNA replication and repair, leading to controversies and difficulties in interpreting mechanisms involved in aging and cancer.

Innovation Solution

A genome-wide, unbiased method called Twin-Seq is developed, which involves independently sequencing both strands of DNA to generate a consensus sequence, combined with statistical analysis to identify rare somatic mutations amidst sequencing errors and other background noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional sequencing methods are used to quantify somatic mutations, then the measurement process is simplified, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to high error rates that cannot distinguish true mutations from sequencing errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesomatic mutation detection accuracyVSAvoidsequencing method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The DNA sequencing process is segmented into independent forward and reverse strand sequencing operations. Each strand is sequenced separately and then compared to identify true mutations that appear in both strands, distinguishing them from sequencing errors that occur randomly in only one strand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method uses bidirectional sequencing results as feedback to validate and filter mutation calls. Mutations must be supported by both forward and reverse strand sequencing data to be considered true positives, creating a self-validating measurement system that reduces false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If phenotypic selection or clonal amplification methods are used to detect mutations, then the detection sensitivity is improved for specific mutation types, but the adaptability deteriorates because these methods are limited to special mutation types and cannot provide genome-wide unbiased detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenome-wide mutation detection capabilityVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bidirectional sequencing method is universally applicable to all types of somatic mutations across the entire genome, not limited to specific mutation types or locations. It provides a single platform that can detect point mutations, insertions, deletions, and other variants with consistent reliability throughout the genome.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The method uses the inherent complementarity of double-stranded DNA as a built-in validation mechanism. Each strand serves as a control for the other, with true mutations appearing on both strands and errors appearing on only one, providing self-validating results without requiring external controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If high coverage sequencing is performed to distinguish rare somatic mutations from background noise, then the measurement precision improves, but the loss of substance increases due to the large amount of DNA required and the accumulation of processing errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemutation detection precisionVSAvoidDNA sample degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The method extracts and utilizes the complementary information contained in both DNA strands independently. By analyzing each strand separately and then comparing results, it extracts the true mutation signal while eliminating random sequencing errors, achieving high precision without requiring excessive sequencing depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250129416A1Method for Accurate Sequencing of DNA
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST
  • US20250129416A1 patent drawing
  • US20250129416A1 patent drawing
  • US20250129416A1 patent drawing

AI summary

DNA is sequenced by (a) independently sequencing first and second strands of a dsDNA to obtain corresponding first and second sequences; and (b) combining the first and second sequences to generate a consensus sequence of the dsDNA. By independently sequencing first and second strands the error probability of the consensus sequence approximates a multiplication of those of the first and second sequences.