Two-Channel Bronchoscope Adapter for Simultaneous Procedures

1Productivity

If a single working channel is used for all procedures, then device complexity is reduced, but procedural efficiency and patient safety deteriorate due to prolonged surgical times and hypoxia risk

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveprocedural efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single working channel is segmented into two separate working channels, allowing independent use of each channel for different procedures simultaneously. This segmentation enables parallel execution of multiple functions (e.g., biopsy through one channel while oxygen is delivered through the other), thereby improving procedural efficiency without requiring complete device redesign

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each working channel is designed to be multi-functional, capable of accommodating different tools and procedures. The first working channel can perform biopsy, suction, or oxygen delivery, and the second working channel can perform alternative procedures simultaneously. This multi-functionality allows the bronchoscope to handle diverse procedural needs without channel switching, reducing surgical time

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of time

If a single working channel is used for all procedures, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but surgical time increases due to sequential procedure execution

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvesurgical timeVSAvoidease of manufacture

Core Design Contradiction:

Loss of timeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The single working channel is segmented into two separate working channels, allowing independent use of each channel for different procedures simultaneously. This segmentation enables parallel execution of multiple functions (e.g., biopsy through one channel while oxygen is delivered through the other), thereby improving procedural efficiency without requiring complete device redesign

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second working channel is integrated within the existing bronchoscope structure, with the adapter assembly fitting over the first working channel. This nesting approach allows the second channel to be added without completely redesigning the original device, maintaining manufacturing feasibility while enabling simultaneous multi-procedure execution

Inventive Principle:

Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If a single working channel is used for all procedures, then device simplicity is maintained, but patient safety deteriorates due to hypoxia risk during procedures

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvepatient safetyVSAvoiddevice complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single working channel is segmented into two separate working channels, allowing independent use of each channel for different procedures simultaneously. This segmentation enables parallel execution of multiple functions (e.g., biopsy through one channel while oxygen is delivered through the other), thereby improving procedural efficiency without requiring complete device redesign

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second working channel enables continuous oxygen delivery throughout the procedure without interruption, as oxygen can be supplied through the second channel while the first channel is occupied by biopsy tools or other procedures. This continuous oxygen supply eliminates hypoxia risk and improves patient safety without requiring procedure pauses

Inventive Principle:

Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Adaptability or versatility

If a single working channel is used for all procedures, then structural simplicity is maintained, but procedural versatility deteriorates due to inability to perform multiple functions simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveprocedural versatilityVSAvoiddevice complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single working channel is segmented into two separate working channels, allowing independent use of each channel for different procedures simultaneously. This segmentation enables parallel execution of multiple functions (e.g., biopsy through one channel while oxygen is delivered through the other), thereby improving procedural efficiency without requiring complete device redesign

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each working channel is designed to be multi-functional, capable of accommodating different tools and procedures. The first working channel can perform biopsy, suction, or oxygen delivery, and the second working channel can perform alternative procedures simultaneously. This multi-functionality allows the bronchoscope to handle diverse procedural needs without channel switching, reducing surgical time

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Two-Channel Bronchoscope Adapter for Simultaneous Procedures

Solution Overview

Problem

Innovation Solution

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

2Loss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

3Reliability

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

4Adaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

Data Source

AI summary