Two-Endoscope EMR Technique for Esophageal Lesions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques face complications such as bleeding and perforation due to the use of specially designed, expensive endoscopes with limited availability and require specialized training, and existing methods compromise visualization and procedural efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A two-endoscope technique using a standard uncapped endoscope for chromoendoscopy, injection, snaring, and specimen recovery, and a capped endoscope for suction and ligation, allowing for minimally invasive procedures without the need for specialized equipment or extensive training, thereby reducing the risk of bleeding and perforation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single specially designed endoscope with cap is used for EMR, then the procedure can be performed with integrated functions, but the device complexity increases and availability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegrated EMR functionVSAvoidendoscope structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The EMR procedure is divided into distinct functional stages: chromoendoscopy and injection using a standard uncapped endoscope, followed by suction and ligation using a capped endoscope. This segmentation allows each endoscope to perform its specific function optimally without requiring a complex integrated design, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining procedural versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a specially designed endoscope for EMR is used, then the procedure can be performed, but the cost increases and availability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMR procedure capabilityVSAvoidendoscope availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention utilizes standard endoscopes that are already widely available and familiar to endoscopists, rather than requiring specialized EMR-designed endoscopes. By making the procedure compatible with existing universal equipment, the cost and availability barriers are removed while maintaining reliable EMR capability through the two-endoscope technique.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If a cap is affixed to the endoscope for EMR, then suction and ligation can be performed, but the visualization is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuction and ligation capabilityVSAvoidmucosa visualization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The procedure is segmented so that chromoendoscopy and injection are performed with an uncapped endoscope providing clear visualization, while suction and ligation are performed with a capped endoscope. This temporal and functional segmentation allows each step to be performed with optimal visualization conditions, avoiding the compromise of continuous cap presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If submucosal injection is used to lift the lesion, then the mucosa can be elevated for resection, but the needle positioning becomes difficult within the confined cap space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemucosa elevationVSAvoidneedle positioning difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Submucosal injection is performed as a preliminary action before cap attachment and ligation. By completing the injection step with the uncapped endoscope first, the mucosa is elevated in advance, avoiding the difficulty of needle positioning within the confined cap space during the ligation phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method simplifies EMR procedures, reduces complications by maintaining clear visualization and avoiding the confinement issues of single, specially designed caps, making the technique accessible to more endoscopists and applicable to various gastrointestinal lesions, including Barrett's esophagus and gastric antral intestinal metaplasia.

Implementation Method 1

Chromoendoscopy using an appropriate staining dye, such as methylene blue, is used to identify the mucosa with intestinal metaplasia, a lesion. 0.5% methylene blue is sprayed through a cannula onto the mucosa at least around the area of a lesion.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChromoendoscopy staining: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

Cap-assisted EMR typically uses submucosal injection to lift the target lesion at the mucosa.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSubmucosal injection elevation:

Implementation Method 3

The endoscope is then positioned immediately over the target lesion, suction is used to retract the mucosa into the cap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction retraction: Suction

Implementation Method 4

The cap is usually equipped with a specially designed, crescent-shaped electrocautery snare that is opened and positioned on an internal circumferential ridge at the tip of the cap.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrocautery: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10293061B2Two-endoscope technique of endoscopic mucosal resection and kit with a set of endoscopes for the method
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 LAM SHIU KUM
  • US10293061B2 patent drawing
  • US10293061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

For Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR), particularly for the esophagus and stomach, a kit includes two endoscopes that are used alternatingly to separate chromoendoscopy for staining of intestinal metaplastic mucosa, injecting solution to raise diseased mucosa, snare polypectomy, and wound clipping from cap-assisted suction and ligation of the mucosa, for making these procedures more focused and readily accomplished, with less likelihood of bleeding and perforation.