Two-Laser DIAL Mirror Splitting for Long-Range Gas Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing DIAL systems with two lasers suffer from 50% energy loss due to beam merging, reduced detection range, and sensitivity to atmospheric effects, with potential false detections or failures from blocked apertures.

Innovation Solution

Laser beams from both lasers are merged by a semipermeable mirror and divided into two, each carrying 50% of the energy, directed in parallel to the target through separate apertures, using a semipermeable and a totally reflecting mirror.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If laser beams from both lasers are merged by a semipermeable mirror in a single output aperture, then the system structure is simplified, but 50% energy loss occurs and detection range is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidlaser energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single merged beam into two separate beams, each passing through its own aperture. The first laser beam is split by a semipermeable mirror into two paths (50% through, 50% reflected), and the second laser beam follows a similar path. This segmentation eliminates the 50% energy loss associated with merging beams through a single aperture while maintaining system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If laser beams from both lasers are merged by a semipermeable mirror in a single output aperture, then the system structure is simplified, but detection range drops to about 70%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoiddetection range
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the beam path into two separate apertures instead of merging into one, the patent preserves the full energy of each laser beam. This prevents the 70% detection range reduction that occurs when 50% energy is lost in beam merging, while keeping the overall system structure relatively simple through the use of semipermeable and totally reflecting mirrors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of energy

If two separate output apertures are used for each laser, then energy loss is avoided, but the laser beams propagate through different volumes of atmosphere causing false detections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaser energyVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the benefits of separate beam paths with controlled overlap. While each laser beam initially travels through different atmospheric volumes, the paths are arranged to overlap approximately 50% in the middle section towards the target. This merging approach ensures that both beams experience similar atmospheric conditions in the critical measurement region, improving detection reliability while maintaining energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Loss of energy

If one of the output apertures is accidentally blocked in a two-aperture system, then false detection or prevention of real cloud detection occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaser energyVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a system where the blocking of one aperture can be detected through parameter changes in the received signal. The evaluation unit monitors the signals from both apertures and can identify when one path is blocked, allowing the system to adjust its operation or alert the operator, thereby maintaining detection reliability even when one aperture is obstructed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This arrangement maintains energy efficiency, maximizes detection range, minimizes atmospheric interference, and ensures detection capability even with blocked apertures, enhancing vision safety.

Implementation Method 1

the laser beam generated by the first laser impinges on a semipermeable mirror, where 50% of the laser beam power passes through the semipermeable mirror and proceeds through the first aperture towards the target and at the same time the remaining 50% of the laser beam power reflects from the semipermeable mirror

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSemipermeable mirror beam splitting: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

the remaining 50% of the laser beam power reflects from the semipermeable mirror, impinges on a totally reflecting mirror from which it is reflected and is directed through the second aperture to the same target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTotal reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

The invention relates to a method for the remote detection of gaseous substances in the atmosphere by a DIAL system with two lasers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS12392716B2Method for remote detection of gaseous substances in the atmosphere by the DIAL system with two lasers and a remote detector
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 SEC TECH SRO
  • US12392716B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for remote detection of gaseous substances by a DIAL system includes causing a laser beam generated by a first laser to impinge on a semipermeable mirror, wherein 50% of the laser beam power passes through the semipermeable mirror and proceeds through a first aperture towards a target, wherein a remaining 50% of the laser beam power reflects from the semipermeable mirror and impinges on a reflecting mirror from which it is reflected. The method may also include causing a delayed laser beam generated by a second laser to impinge on the semipermeable mirror, wherein 50% of the laser beam power passes through the semipermeable mirror and impinges on the reflecting mirror from which it is reflected and is directed through the second aperture to the target and at the same time a remaining 50% of the laser beam power reflects from the semipermeable mirror.