Two-Layer Food Packaging With Movable Meal Information Fields

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food packaging for varied meal options, such as different versions of burgers, fails to distinguish between variations after packaging, leading to increased complexity and cost due to perforated sections requiring complex production.

Innovation Solution

A two-layer food packaging design with movable information fields that can be opened or closed to reveal specific meal properties, allowing easy adaptation and identification without tools, using sheets of paper or parchment paper substitutes for cost-effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If perforated sections are added to the packaging to indicate different meal versions, then the packaging can be adapted to different dish variations, but the production complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different dish versionsVSAvoidpackaging production complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging information is segmented into multiple flaps, each representing a different meal version (e.g., classic, vegetarian, spicy). Each flap can be independently opened or closed, allowing the packaging to display only the relevant information for the packaged dish version without requiring complex production processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging transitions from a static design to a dynamic one where flaps can be opened or closed based on the dish version. This dynamic capability allows the same packaging to adapt to different meal variations without requiring multiple different packaging designs, thus reducing production complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If multiple information fields are included on the packaging, then all dish variations can be identified, but the packaging design becomes more complex and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation about dish propertiesVSAvoidpackaging structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple information fields are segmented into separate flaps rather than being combined in a complex layout. Each flap contains information for one dish version and can be independently managed, simplifying the overall packaging structure while ensuring all necessary information is available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each flap has a distinct local quality with contrasting colors and simple graphical representations specific to its dish version. This allows each information field to be clearly identified and understood without requiring complex overall design, maintaining simplicity while providing comprehensive information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If the same packaging is used for different dish versions, then production costs are reduced, but the different versions cannot be distinguished after packaging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging manufacturing simplicityVSAvoididentification of dish variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging uses dynamic flaps that can be opened or closed during the packaging process to reveal or hide specific information. This allows the same simple packaging structure to convey different information for different dish versions, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while preventing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The appropriate flap is opened or closed in advance during the packaging process before the package reaches the consumer. This preliminary action ensures that only the relevant information for the specific dish version is visible, maintaining clear identification without requiring complex packaging designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If contrasting colors are used for information fields, then identification of open fields is faster, but the packaging design becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of information identificationVSAvoidpackaging design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each flap uses a distinct contrasting color and simple graphical representation specific to its dish version. This local differentiation allows for rapid identification of the relevant information field without requiring complex overall design, as each flap is self-contained and easily distinguishable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Different colors are assigned to different flaps to represent different dish versions (e.g., red for spicy, green for vegetarian). This use of color changes provides immediate visual identification of the relevant information field, increasing productivity without adding significant design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Data Source

PatentEP4641547A1Food package
Publication Date: 2025.10.29 ELLER FOODPACKAGING
  • EP4641547A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP4641547A1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP4641547A1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

Food packaging (10) with an information unit (12) comprising a lower layer (14), an upper layer (16) arranged on the lower layer (14) and at least one information area (22, 24), wherein at least one information field (26) is arranged in the at least one information area (22, 24), wherein in each of the at least one information field (26) the lower layer (14) has a lower information field (28) and the upper layer (16) has an upper information field (30), and wherein the at least one information field (26) can be brought from a closed state in which the upper information field (30) covers the lower information field (28) to an open state in which the upper information field (30) reveals the lower information field (28).