Two-Layer Tire Carcass for Higher Load Without Larger Size

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing passenger vehicle tires are unable to bear the increased load required for extended electric vehicle ranges without compromising vehicle roominess, compactness, and comfort, as they either require larger sizes, higher inflation pressures, or excessive carcass reinforcement tensioning.

Innovation Solution

A tire design with a higher load index than standard EXTRA LOAD tires, featuring a crown, beads, and sidewalls with a carcass reinforcement comprising two layers and specific filamentary elements, arranged to reduce tensioning and energy dissipation, maintaining the same size and comfort while supporting increased loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the tire size is increased to bear greater load, then the load-bearing capacity is improved, but the vehicle interior space is reduced and exterior bulk is enlarged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidvehicle interior space
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The carcass reinforcement is divided into two separate layers (first carcass layer and second carcass layer) with different orientations. The first layer has filaments extending axially between beads, while the second layer has filaments extending circumferentially around the crown. This segmentation allows each layer to bear specific loads efficiently, enabling higher overall load capacity without increasing tire size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-layer carcass structure to a two-layer carcass structure with different spatial orientations. The first layer provides axial strength while the second layer provides circumferential strength, effectively utilizing multiple dimensions of reinforcement to achieve superior load-bearing capacity within the same tire volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If the tire size is increased to bear greater load, then the load-bearing capacity is improved, but the rolling resistance and external noise increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidrolling resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the carcass reinforcement into two specialized layers, each optimized for its specific function, the tire achieves high load capacity without requiring an overall size increase. This prevents the increase in rolling resistance that would result from larger tire dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If the recommended inflation pressure is increased to bear greater load, then the load-bearing capacity is improved, but the tire stiffness increases and passenger comfort is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidpassenger comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The two-layer carcass structure distributes the load-bearing function between axial and circumferential layers, allowing the tire to support higher loads at moderate inflation pressures. This maintains tire flexibility and passenger comfort while achieving the required load capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The carcass reinforcement uses composite construction with two layers of filamentary reinforcement oriented differently. This composite structure provides enhanced mechanical properties, enabling the tire to bear greater loads without requiring high inflation pressures that would compromise comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If the carcass reinforcement tensioning is increased to bear greater load, then the load-bearing capacity is improved, but the energy dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidenergy dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the carcass reinforcement into two layers with different orientations, the tensioning forces are distributed more efficiently. The axial layer handles radial loads while the circumferential layer handles tangential loads, reducing overall energy dissipation compared to a single high-tension layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20230382163A1Tire comprising two carcass layers
Publication Date: 2023.11.30 MICHELIN & CO (CIE GEN DES ESTAB MICHELIN)
  • US20230382163A1 patent drawing
  • US20230382163A1 patent drawing
  • US20230382163A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The tire (11) for a passenger vehicle comprises a crown (12), two beads (32), two sidewalls (30) each connecting each bead (32) to the crown (12), and a carcass reinforcement (34) anchored in each bead (32). The tire (11) has a load index Ll such that Ll≥Ll′+1 and Ll′ being the load index of an EXTRA LOAD tire of the same size in accordance with the manual of the ETRTO 2019 standard. The tire (11) has a sidewall height H defined by H=SW×AR/100, where SW is the nominal section width and AR is the nominal aspect ratio of the tire in accordance with the manual of the ETRTO 2019 standard, such that H≥95. The carcass reinforcement (34) comprises two carcass layers (36, 37).