Two-Layer Vegetation System for Green Roofs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vegetation systems for green roofs are complex, costly to maintain, and difficult to replace, with varying growth phases and challenges in drainage, leading to potential slippage and maintenance issues.

Innovation Solution

A two-layer vegetation system comprising a lower mat with high substrate concentration and open-pore polyurethane foam, and an upper layer with minimal substrate, featuring drainage channels and biodegradable fastenings for secure attachment, allowing for efficient water distribution and root growth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pre-cultivated mat-shaped elements are used for extensive roof greening, then plant growth support is improved, but labor intensity and horticultural maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant growth supportVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two separate layers: a lower mat made from persistent polymeric foam containing substrates, and an upper vegetation element that can be pre-cultivated. This segmentation allows the substrate-containing lower mat to be installed once and remain permanently, while only the lightweight upper vegetation element requires periodic replacement, significantly reducing labor intensity compared to replacing entire pre-cultivated mats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The upper vegetation element is designed as a temporary, replaceable component that can be pre-cultivated and easily replaced when its functional life ends. This disposable approach to the upper layer, combined with the permanent lower mat, reduces long-term maintenance costs and labor intensity compared to replacing entire permanent mats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Productivity

If drainage channels are added to the lower mat, then water drainage efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater drainage efficiencyVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drainage channels are integrated directly into the lower mat structure itself, merging the drainage function with the substrate delivery function. The channels are formed as cavities within the polymeric foam matrix, eliminating the need for separate drainage components and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high drainage efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lower mat is made from open-pore polymeric foam material that inherently provides porosity for water movement. The drainage channels utilize this porous structure to efficiently conduct water away from the vegetation element, achieving effective drainage through the material's inherent properties rather than complex mechanical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Ease of operation

If a two-layer vegetation system is used, then maintenance simplicity is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance simplicityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the permanent substrate-containing lower mat from the replaceable upper vegetation element. This segmentation simplifies maintenance by allowing replacement of only the upper layer, while the lower mat remains in place. The manufacturing complexity is managed by producing these as two separate components that are assembled during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lower mat is pre-manufactured with substrates incorporated into the polymeric foam structure during production. This preliminary incorporation of substrates eliminates the need for separate substrate installation steps and simplifies both manufacturing and maintenance, as the substrate delivery system is already integrated into the permanent lower mat structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system simplifies maintenance, promotes efficient water drainage, prevents slippage, and ensures stable plant growth, reducing labor costs and maintenance complexity while allowing for easy replacement.

Implementation Method 1

the lower mat of the vegetation system is constructed from a non-degradable, open-pore polymer foam made from polyurethane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

the lower mat is formed with at least two drainage channels in the longitudinal and transverse directions... the rainwater is forwarded as quickly as possible through the drainage channels to the rain gutters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP1898019B1Vegetation system for turfing
Publication Date: 2010.03.24 FLORDEPOT INT
  • EP1898019B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1898019B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP1898019B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b

AI summary

The vegetation system (1), particularly for roof gardens, has a mat (2) as the bottom layer, with substrates for plant growth and a vegetation element (5) lying above the mat. This consists of a thin soil layer (6) with a substrate, and a low-substrate layer (15), on which the plants (9) are planted. There may be at least one fixing device to hold the vegetation element on the mat.