Two-Part Closure Reducing Opening Force via Segmented Torque

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing two-part closures require excessive force to open due to vacuum resistance, as the combined torque for unscrewing and breaking the seal is high, especially when dealing with containers that experience negative pressure.

Innovation Solution

A two-part closure design featuring a disc and skirt where the disc is held by an inwardly projecting rim and lugs, allowing separate stages of torque application to rotate the skirt and pry the disc away from the container, with the lugs only needing to resist crushing forces, thus reducing the material thickness and effort required.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the lugs are made stronger to resist vacuum forces, then the sealing reliability is improved, but the opening force becomes excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidopening force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The opening process is segmented into two distinct stages: first rotating the skirt to activate tamper-evident features, then prising the disc from the container. This segmentation allows the lugs to be optimized for prising rather than having to handle both unscrewing and seal-breaking forces simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The closure transitions from a static sealed state to a dynamic opening sequence. The skirt rotates first, then the disc is prised away, creating a dynamic two-stage opening mechanism that reduces the peak force required compared to a single-stage opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If thicker material is used for the lugs, then the strength to resist crushing forces is improved, but the weight and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelug strengthVSAvoidclosure weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The lugs only need to resist crushing forces during the second stage of opening when the disc is prised away, not during the initial unscrewing stage. This dynamic loading condition allows for thinner, lighter lug design while maintaining adequate strength for the specific prising function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the disc is held tightly by the inwardly projecting rim and lugs, then the seal integrity is improved, but the torque required to open the closure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal integrityVSAvoidopening torque
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The holding mechanism is segmented into the inwardly projecting rim providing initial containment and the lugs providing secondary retention during prising. This segmentation allows the disc to be held securely during sealing while enabling controlled release through the two-stage opening process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retention system transitions from a static tight hold during sealing to a dynamic controlled release during opening. The skirt rotation precedes disc removal, dynamically managing the release of sealing forces to reduce peak opening torque.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9387959B2Closure
Publication Date: 2016.07.12 CROWN PACKAGING TECH INC
  • US9387959B2 patent drawing
  • US9387959B2 patent drawing
  • US9387959B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A two-part closure (1) which has a disc (2) and a skirt (3). In one example, the skirt wall is smooth between upper and lower rims so that the disc is moveable between the rim features. Typically in a metal skirt or ring, the upper rim feature is a curl (11) and the lower rim feature is a curled edge (12) with equi-spaced lugs (13) on the skirt wall.