Two-Phase Asymmetrical Three-Level Buck Converter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional DC-DC converters face challenges in achieving high power density due to large inductor size, uneven output current sharing in multi-phase converters, and limited voltage gain due to duty cycle limitations, which complicates control and increases cost.

Innovation Solution

A two-phase asymmetrical three-level buck converter with a specific switch configuration and controller-driven operation that prolongs duty cycles and overlaps switch on-times, allowing for increased output voltage and automatic inductor current sharing without additional sensing circuits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If switching frequency is increased to reduce inductor size, then inductor volume is reduced, but power loss increases and switches overheat

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinductor volumeVSAvoidpower loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single-phase converter into two interleaved phases, each operating at a lower switching frequency. The two phases share the total output current, allowing the use of smaller inductors with lower ripple current while maintaining the same power delivery capability, thus reducing inductor volume without proportionally increasing power loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs interleaved periodic switching of two phases, where each phase operates at a lower frequency but with phase-shifted timing. This periodic action distributes the stress on individual components, reduces peak current ripple, and allows for smaller inductor design while avoiding excessive power loss from high-frequency switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Volume of moving object

If switching frequency is increased beyond tens of MHz, then inductor size is reduced, but duty cycle becomes very small limiting maximum frequency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinductor sizeVSAvoidduty cycle range
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the power delivery into two interleaved phases, each phase can operate with a more practical duty cycle range. The phase shift allows each inductor to handle a portion of the total current, enabling the use of lower switching frequencies with adequate duty cycles while still achieving reduced inductor sizes compared to a single high-frequency phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If multi-phase converters are used to improve efficiency, then power delivery capability is improved, but output current sharing becomes uneven due to tolerance and parasitic components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery capabilityVSAvoidoutput current sharing uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates current sensing circuits for each phase and implements feedback control to detect and correct imbalances in output current sharing. By continuously monitoring the current in each phase and adjusting the switching duty cycles accordingly, the system maintains uniform current distribution despite component tolerances and parasitic variations, enabling high power delivery capability with precise current sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If multi-phase converters are used to improve efficiency, then power delivery capability is improved, but auxiliary circuits and components are needed increasing cost and control complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery capabilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the control system to automatically balance current sharing between phases through inherent feedback mechanisms without requiring complex external auxiliary circuits. The controller self-adjusts the duty cycles of each phase based on real-time current measurements, eliminating the need for additional current-sharing inductors or complex synchronization hardware, thus reducing overall device complexity while maintaining high power delivery capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Device complexity

If conventional buck converter topology is used, then simplicity is maintained, but inductor occupies large substrate space reducing power density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconverter simplicityVSAvoidsubstrate space
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the conventional single-phase topology into two interleaved phases, which allows for reduced inductor size and better substrate space utilization. While this increases control complexity, the segmentation enables higher power density by reducing the area occupied by magnetic components, achieving a balance between complexity and space efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-phase to a two-phase architecture, adding the dimension of phase interleaving. This dimensional change allows the system to achieve the same power delivery with smaller individual inductors, effectively reducing the substrate area required while distributing the complexity across multiple synchronized channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10498236B2Two-phase three-level converter and controller therefor
Publication Date: 2019.12.03 LIU TIANSHU
  • US10498236B2 patent drawing
  • US10498236B2 patent drawing
  • US10498236B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are multilevel buck converters, and controllers and methods for operating such converters. Embodiments improve the voltage gain (Vo/Vin) of multi-level DC-DC converters, such as three-level converters, that is imposed by a duty cycle limitation in conventional approaches. According to certain embodiments, the duty cycle of switches is controlled to so that the converter output voltage is increased.