Two-Rod Piston Assembly to Reduce Engine Knock and Rotation Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional internal combustion engines face inefficiencies due to high rotation resistance at specific piston positions, leading to increased energy requirements and potential engine knock, which affects overall efficiency and power production.

Innovation Solution

A piston assembly design featuring an upper rod fixed relative to the piston head and a lower rod that pivots about the upper rod, allowing for a shorter lever length and improved mechanical advantage, reducing the force required to move the piston and enhancing engine efficiency by optimizing the angle between the lower rod and crankshaft.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a conventional single connecting rod is used with connecting points at the ends of the longitudinal center axis, then the structure is simple, but high rotation resistance occurs at specific piston positions leading to increased energy requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnecting rod structureVSAvoidenergy requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The single connecting rod is divided into two separate rods: an upper rod that is fixed to the piston head and a lower rod that pivots about the upper rod. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each rod's function, reducing rotation resistance and energy requirements while maintaining structural simplicity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lower rod is designed to pivot dynamically about the upper rod, creating a movable joint that optimizes the angle between the lower rod and crankshaft during operation. This dynamic adjustment reduces rotation resistance at specific piston positions, thereby decreasing energy requirements compared to fixed connecting rod designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a conventional single connecting rod is used, then the structure is simple, but engine knock increases affecting efficiency and power production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnecting rod structureVSAvoidengine knock
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Dividing the connecting rod into upper and lower segments with a pivot joint allows optimization of force distribution and reduction of peak loads on the piston, thereby decreasing engine knock while maintaining structural simplicity through modular construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pivot joint enables dynamic change in the angle between the lower rod and crankshaft, optimizing mechanical advantage and reducing peak forces that cause engine knock, thus improving efficiency and power production without increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If the lower rod pivots about the upper rod with shorter lever length, then mechanical advantage is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical advantageVSAvoidpiston assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pivot joint creates a dynamic mechanism where the lower rod can rotate relative to the upper rod, optimizing the lever length and mechanical advantage during different phases of the engine cycle. This dynamic optimization improves power output while the modular two-rod structure maintains relative simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The pivot joint introduces rotational freedom in a new dimension, allowing the lower rod to adjust its angle relative to the upper rod and crankshaft. This dimensional freedom optimizes mechanical advantage without requiring complex multi-component mechanisms, balancing power improvement with structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces rotation resistance, allows for more efficient energy transfer, and decreases engine knock, resulting in improved power production and reduced emissions while maintaining cylinder size and piston number.

Implementation Method 1

allowing for a shorter lever length and improved mechanical advantage, reducing the force required to move the piston

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS11506141B2Reciprocating-piston assembly, internal combustion engine, and related methods
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 TRANSCEND ENERGY GROUP LLC
  • US11506141B2 patent drawing
  • US11506141B2 patent drawing
  • US11506141B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A piston assembly includes a piston head for reciprocating back and forth within a cylinder of an engine, an upper rod coupled to the piston head at one longitudinal end of the upper rod and fixed relative to the piston head, and a lower rod rotatably coupled to an opposite longitudinal end of the upper rod, the lower rod configured to pivot about the opposite longitudinal end of the upper rod. The lower rod is configured to couple to a crankshaft at a longitudinal end of the lower rod opposite the upper rod. Methods of forming a piston assembly and engines incorporating such piston assemblies are also disclosed.