Two-Roller Variator Transmission with Lever-Controlled Force Equalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing variator transmissions are costly and complex, making them unsuitable for low-power, low-torque applications due to the need for multiple rollers and hydraulic control systems.

Innovation Solution

A simplified variator transmission design using two rollers with lever-controlled contact and radial movement of the pivotal axis to equalize forces, reducing complexity and cost, while maintaining stability through resiliently deformable end load means and a mixing epicyclic gear train.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If three rollers are used in each toroidal cavity to provide stable power transmission, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need for multiple double-acting control pistons and computer-controlled hydraulic pressures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the complex hydraulic control system (double-acting pistons and computer control) from each roller, replacing it with a simple mechanical lever mechanism. This eliminates the need for sophisticated control systems while maintaining reliable power transmission through the two-roller design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The lever mechanism automatically self-adjusts to equalize forces on the rollers through its geometric configuration and the radial movement of the pivotal axis, eliminating the need for external control systems. The system serves itself by using the inherent mechanics of the lever to maintain balanced roller contact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Power

If multiple rollers and hydraulic control systems are used to handle high power and torque, then power transmission capability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transmission capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive hydraulic components and control systems with simple, inexpensive mechanical elements like levers and pivot pins. These simple components are easier and cheaper to manufacture while still providing adequate performance for the intended application range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention combines the functions of multiple complex hydraulic control systems into a single simple mechanical lever mechanism. This merging reduces the total number of components and simplifies manufacturing while maintaining the necessary power transmission capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If two rollers are used instead of three to reduce complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but stability deteriorates due to increased bending of variator components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of rollersVSAvoidcomponent bending stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces dynamic adjustment through the lever mechanism, where the pivotal axis can move radially to equalize forces on the two rollers. This dynamic force equalization compensates for the reduced roller count and prevents excessive bending of components by optimizing the load distribution in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a cost-effective and stable transmission suitable for low-power applications by simplifying the design and control mechanism, ensuring balanced roller contact and minimizing wear, while allowing for variable gear ratios.

Implementation Method 1

end load means to urge the rollers into contact with the input and output discs to transmit drive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7955210B2Drive mechanism for infinitely variable transmission
Publication Date: 2011.06.07 ALLISON TRANSMISSION INC
  • US7955210B2 patent drawing
  • US7955210B2 patent drawing
  • US7955210B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A variator transmission comprises an input shaft (18), an input disc (10) mounted on the input shaft for rotation therewith and an output disc (12) facing the input disc and arranged to rotate coaxially therewith, the input and output discs defining between them a toroidal cavity. Two rollers (14, 16) are located in the toroidal cavity and first and second roller carriage means are provided upon which the first and second rollers respectively are rotatably mounted and end load means (34, 36) urge the rollers into contact with the input and output discs to transmit drive. The two roller carriage means are mounted on opposite sides of the pivotal axis of a lever (50) and the pivotal axis of the lever (50) is movable in the radial direction with respect to the rotational axis of the input and output discs.