Two-Shell Seating Furniture Design for Full-Surface Decal Insertion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current seating furniture designs do not allow for a full-surface decorative solution without moving parts or mechanical components, while maintaining comfort, stackability, and durability standards.

Innovation Solution

A seating furniture design comprising two connected seat shells forming a continuous seat and backrest surface, with a gap space between them for inserting a decal sheet through a slit-shaped access opening, allowing for easy replacement and full-surface decoration without mechanical components, using connecting strips for attachment and ensuring stackability and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional single-shell seat designs are used with moving parts or mechanical components for decorative panel insertion, then decorative versatility is improved, but device complexity and structural integrity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecorative versatilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The seat is divided into two separate shells (first and second shells) that are positioned adjacent to each other, creating a gap space between them. This segmentation allows the decorative sheet to be inserted into the gap space without requiring moving parts or mechanical components, thus achieving decorative versatility while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The decorative sheet is nested within the gap space between the two shells, effectively hiding it within the structure of the seat itself. This allows the decorative element to be integrated into the seat's construction without adding external moving parts or complex mechanical insertion mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If transparent panels are used to allow decal sheet insertion, then decorative adaptability is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecorative adaptabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The first shell is made transparent while the second shell can be made of different materials, allowing the decorative sheet to be visible through the transparent portion while maintaining structural integrity and design flexibility. This local transparency approach achieves decorative adaptability without requiring the entire structure to be complex or expensive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If mechanical components are used for decal sheet insertion and removal, then ease of replacement is improved, but device complexity and durability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of replacementVSAvoidmechanical component complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The decorative sheet is extracted from the traditional approach of being attached to a single shell with mechanical fasteners. Instead, it is placed in the gap space between two shells, allowing it to be removed and replaced by simply accessing the gap space without any mechanical components, thus simplifying the structure while maintaining ease of replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The gap space between the two shells acts as an intermediary space that facilitates the insertion and removal of the decorative sheet. This intermediate space allows for easy access and replacement of the decorative element without requiring complex mechanical fastening or release mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If full-surface decorative coverage is achieved, then aesthetic versatility is improved, but structural integrity and comfort worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic versatilityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the seat into two separate shells with a gap space between them, the decorative sheet can cover the entire visible surface area of the seat while the structural integrity is maintained in the two separate shell components. Each shell can be optimized for structural strength while the gap space accommodates the full-surface decorative coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3399887B8Piece of seating furniture in two-shell design for holding decal sheets
Publication Date: 2019.11.27 PARTY RENT SCHWEIZ AG

AI summary

The invention relates to a piece of seating furniture (1) formed from two seat shells (2, 3) connected to one another, which form a seating surface and a backrest of the piece of seating furniture (1) as a connected component, wherein the upper and lower seat shells (2, 3) connected to form the piece of seating furniture (1) are designed approximately identically in construction and same are connected to one another only in the edge region (4) thereof such that a free, narrow and flat gap space (5) remains between the seat shells (2, 3), which holds a decal sheet (7) via a slot-shaped access opening (6) on the top side (10) of the backrest and/or on the front edge (11) of the seating surface and/or in the rear surface of the piece of seating furniture (1), which decal sheet is approximately the size of the surface of the piece of seating furniture (1).