Two-Sided Cable Tie with Asymmetric Teeth for Enhanced Tensile Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cable ties with teeth on a single side suffer from breakage and loosening issues due to uneven thickness and concentrated force on individual teeth, leading to reduced bundling fastness.

Innovation Solution

A cable tie design featuring two tooth-shaped sides with convex and inner teeth that are asymmetrically distributed and partially overlapping, combined with a locking mechanism using a fixed tooth and elastic block, to distribute force evenly and enhance tensile strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If teeth are provided on one side of the tie body, then the structure is simple, but the tie body has non-uniform thickness and teeth are easily broken

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidtooth strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The single row of teeth on one side is segmented into two rows of teeth on opposite sides of the tie body. Each row engages with corresponding locking teeth, distributing the engagement force across multiple teeth rather than concentrating it on a single row, thereby preventing tooth breakage while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Two rows of teeth on opposite sides work together with corresponding locking teeth to provide combined engagement force. This merging of multiple engagement points creates a more robust locking mechanism that distributes stress evenly, preventing the non-uniform thickness issue while enhancing overall strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Device complexity

If teeth are provided on one side of the tie body, then the locking mechanism is simple, but a single row of teeth is subjected to large engagement force causing teeth breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking mechanism complexityVSAvoidengagement force on teeth
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The single engagement point is segmented into multiple engagement points with two rows of teeth on opposite sides. Each row engages with its corresponding locking teeth, dividing the total engagement force into two separate force paths, thereby reducing the force on individual teeth and preventing breakage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The engagement mechanism transitions from a single-plane engagement to a multi-plane engagement with teeth on opposite sides. This dimensional change allows force to be distributed across different spatial locations, reducing concentrated stress on any single tooth while maintaining a relatively simple locking mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If teeth are provided on one side of the tie body, then the structure is simple, but the tie body is shaken by external force causing hook-off and slip-off

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidbundling fastness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single engagement interface is segmented into two separate engagement interfaces on opposite sides. This segmentation creates multiple independent engagement points that must simultaneously fail for the bundle to loosen, significantly improving reliability while keeping the overall structure simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Two engagement interfaces work together to provide combined locking action. The merging of multiple engagement points creates a redundant system where force must overcome both engagement interfaces simultaneously, preventing hook-off and slip-off under external shaking forces while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design prevents tooth breakage and loosening by evenly distributing force across both sides, improving bundling fastness and durability by reducing the force on individual teeth and maintaining uniform thickness.

Implementation Method 1

one end of the elastic block is fixedly connected to an inner wall of one side of the locking head close to the tie body, a plurality of movable teeth are provided on and fixed to one side of the elastic block close to the fixed tooth, and the movable teeth are adapted to the inner teeth in a meshing manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12168558B2Cable tie with two tooth shaped sides having enhanced tension
Publication Date: 2024.12.17 DUAN LILONG
  • US12168558B2 patent drawing
  • US12168558B2 patent drawing
  • US12168558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed in the present invention is a cable tie with two tooth shaped sides having enhanced tension, including a locking head and a tie body; one end of the tie body is fixedly connected to an outer wall of one end of the locking head close to an insertion opening, tie teeth are provided on and fixed to outer walls of two sides of the tie body, locking teeth are mounted on inner walls of two sides of the locking head, the locking teeth are adapted to the tie teeth, and a protruding head is integrally formed at one end of the tie body away from the locking head. The tie teeth are provided on and fixed to outer walls of two sides of the tie body, and in combination with the locking teeth provided on the inner walls of the two sides of the locking head.