Two-Stage Calcination for Silver Catalyst Uniformity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional calcination processes for silver-based catalysts in the epoxidation of ethylene are costly and result in a less uniform catalyst with higher residual organic species, leading to longer startup times and reduced profitability due to the use of inert gas atmospheres, while air calcination alone produces undesirable catalysts with more residual organics.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage calcination process is employed, where the impregnated support is first calcined in an air atmosphere and then in an inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen, to produce a more uniform and efficient catalyst with fewer residual organics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If calcination is conducted in an air atmosphere to reduce costs, then manufacturing cost decreases, but the catalyst becomes less uniform in color and contains greater amounts of residual organic species

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidcatalyst uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The calcination process is divided into two distinct stages: first calcination in air atmosphere at lower temperature to remove organic species, and second calcination in inert gas atmosphere at higher temperature to achieve uniform catalyst color and properties. This segmentation allows each stage to optimize for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between cost and uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If calcination is conducted in an air atmosphere to reduce costs, then manufacturing cost decreases, but the time to remove residual organic species increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidstartup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The two-stage calcination process separates organic removal (first stage in air) from final catalyst formation (second stage in inert gas). This allows organic species to be removed efficiently during manufacturing, reducing the time required during catalyst startup while maintaining cost benefits of air calcination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first calcination stage in air atmosphere is performed preliminarily to remove organic species before the second calcination stage. This preliminary action of organic removal during manufacturing reduces the burden and time required during subsequent catalyst startup operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If calcination is conducted in an inert gas atmosphere to produce uniform catalyst with fewer organics, then catalyst quality improves, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst uniformityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The process segments the calcination into two stages with different atmospheric requirements. The first stage uses inexpensive air for organic removal, while the second stage uses inert gas for final uniformity. This segmentation achieves high catalyst quality while minimizing overall manufacturing cost by using expensive inert gas only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If calcination temperature is increased to remove organic species faster, then productivity improves, but the catalyst may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorganic removal rateVSAvoidcatalyst integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The two-stage process allows the first stage to operate at lower temperatures in air for safe organic removal, and the second stage to operate at higher temperatures in inert gas for rapid organic elimination. This segmentation enables progressive temperature increase without catalyst damage, improving productivity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first calcination stage performs preliminary organic removal at lower temperatures, preparing the catalyst for subsequent high-temperature treatment. This preliminary action protects the catalyst from thermal shock and damage that would occur if high temperature were applied directly to the impregnated support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process reduces manufacturing time, decreases organic residues, and lowers costs compared to single-stage inert gas calcination, resulting in a more efficient and profitable catalyst production for ethylene oxide production.

Implementation Method 1

a first calcination in an air atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

a second calcination in an inert gas atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS8378129B2Two-stage calcination for catalyst production
Publication Date: 2013.02.19 SD LIZENZVERWERTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH & CO KG

AI summary

The invention relates to an improved process for producing a catalyst useful for the epoxidation of ethylene to ethylene oxide. In forming the catalyst, a silver-impregnated support is subjected to two calcinations. The support is subjected to a first calcination in a first atmosphere comprising air. Next the support is subjected to a second calcination in a second atmosphere which is substantially entirely comprised of inert gas, and which second atmosphere is substantially absent of hydrogen. This two-stage calcination produces an improved catalyst which contains fewer organics left over under standard conditions of air calcination alone, while costing less than calcination in an inert gas alone.