Two-Stage Carbon Adsorption for Hydrocarbon Vapor Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydrocarbon vapor recovery systems are inefficient in capturing light hydrocarbons (C2-C3) and result in environmental and resource wastage, as these vapors are often vented or burned due to the selective adsorption of activated carbon beds, which preferentially adsorb heavier hydrocarbons (C4-C6 and greater).

Innovation Solution

A two-stage carbon bed adsorption system is employed, where the first stage captures heavier hydrocarbons (C4-C6 and greater) and the second stage targets light hydrocarbons (C2-C3), with both stages utilizing vacuum regeneration to convert the captured hydrocarbons into liquid or gaseous fuels for recovery and utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a single activated carbon bed is used for vapor recovery, then heavy hydrocarbons (C4-C6 and greater) are effectively adsorbed, but light hydrocarbons (C2-C3) pass through unadsorbed and are vented or burned

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery of heavy hydrocarbonsVSAvoidloss of light hydrocarbons
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The single carbon bed is divided into two separate carbon beds arranged in series. The first carbon bed is dedicated to adsorbing heavy hydrocarbons (C4-C6 and greater), while the second carbon bed is dedicated to adsorbing light hydrocarbons (C2-C3). This segmentation allows each bed to be optimized for its specific target hydrocarbon range, preventing the light hydrocarbons from passing through unadsorbed as would occur in a single bed system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of substance

If light hydrocarbons are vented to atmosphere, then resource is wasted, but environmental pollution increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery of light hydrocarbons as fuelVSAvoidenvironmental pollution from venting
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful act of venting light hydrocarbons to atmosphere into a beneficial resource recovery process. The second carbon bed adsorbs the light hydrocarbons that would otherwise be vented, and during regeneration, these adsorbed light hydrocarbons are desorbed and collected as a combustible gas that can be used as fuel. This transforms the harmful emission into a useful energy resource.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Loss of substance

If light hydrocarbons are sent to flare for combustion, then resource is wasted, but carbon dioxide emissions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery of light hydrocarbons as fuelVSAvoidgreenhouse gas emissions from flaring
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of combusting the light hydrocarbons in a flare which produces CO2 emissions, the system recovers them in adsorbed form on the second carbon bed, then collects and stores them as a combustible gas during regeneration. This allows the light hydrocarbons to be preserved as a fuel resource rather than being destroyed in combustion, thereby eliminating the associated greenhouse gas emissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Loss of substance

If a two-stage carbon bed system is implemented, then both light and heavy hydrocarbons are recovered, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall hydrocarbon recovery efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of multi-stage adsorption system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges two separate carbon bed adsorption units into a unified vapor recovery process. Both beds operate in series handling the same vapor stream, with the first bed treating heavy hydrocarbons and the second bed treating light hydrocarbons. During regeneration, both beds are processed similarly through vacuum desorption, and the recovered hydrocarbons are combined and used as fuel gas. This merging approach achieves comprehensive recovery while maintaining operational simplicity through standardized regeneration procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system effectively recovers and utilizes both light and heavy hydrocarbons, reducing environmental impact and resource wastage by converting vapors into usable fuels, improving the working capacity and efficiency of hydrocarbon recovery.

Implementation Method 1

Activated carbon attracts hydrocarbon material on its surface, with a higher preference for adsorbing the heavy hydrocarbons in the range of C4-C6 and greater

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

it is then taken off line and regenerated by subjecting it to a vacuum. The hydrocarbons that were adsorbed onto the carbon bed will be drawn off by the vacuum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 3

the vapor will pass through a liquid hydrocarbon shower, such as for example gasoline, where the gaseous hydrocarbons will be absorbed in the liquid hydrocarbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS9427693B1Process for vapor emission control
Publication Date: 2016.08.30 HILL JOEL DAVID
  • US9427693B1 patent drawing
  • US9427693B1 patent drawing
  • US9427693B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vapor emission control system for recovering hydrocarbon vapors displaced as vessels are loading consisting of two stages of carbon adsorption vapor recovery units. The first stage with two or more parallel carbon beds recovers the heavier C4-C6+ hydrocarbons on a first carbon bed which are then removed as a gas via vacuum and then converted into a liquid product via a vapor-to-liquid conversion unit. Lighter C2-C3 hydrocarbon vapor discharged from the first stage is recovered on two or more parallel carbon beds of the second stage. The vapor is then removed via vacuum as a concentrated gas for use as fuel or sent to a flare. The hydrocarbon lean first portion of the off-gas from each vacuum desorption is recycled to the other in-parallel carbon bed. The load and regeneration cycles alternate for the two carbon beds in each of the two stages based on an optimized time cycle.