Two-Stage CO2 Adsorption Using Collapsed Ultra-Small-Pore Zeolite

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing carbon dioxide (CO2) capture technologies, such as liquid adsorption using amine or alkali hydroxides, are inefficient and costly, and there is a need for improved methods to reduce CO2 emissions effectively.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage CO2 adsorption process using collapsed zeolite with ultra-small pores, where the first stage selectively adsorbs water and the second stage captures CO2, utilizing molecular sieve 3A and partially collapsed Linde Type A aluminosilicate zeolite adsorbents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If liquid adsorption using amine or alkali hydroxides is used for CO2 capture, then CO2 separation can be achieved, but the process becomes inefficient and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 capture efficiencyVSAvoidprocess efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs zeolite adsorbents with controlled pore structures (including collapsed zeolite with ultra-small pores) to selectively adsorb CO2 from gas streams. The porous nature of zeolite provides high surface area and selective permeability, enabling efficient CO2 capture without the inefficiencies of liquid adsorption methods. The adsorbent material's pore structure allows CO2 molecules to enter and be captured while maintaining process efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes temperature swing adsorption (TSA) and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) processes to regenerate the zeolite adsorbent. By changing temperature and pressure parameters, the adsorbent can be regenerated and reused continuously. This parameter-based regeneration approach maintains high capture efficiency while improving overall process productivity and reducing costs compared to liquid adsorption methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a two-stage adsorption process is implemented, then CO2 capture efficiency is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 capture efficiencyVSAvoidadsorption system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the CO2 capture process into two sequential stages: (1) water removal using molecular sieve 3A, and (2) CO2 adsorption using collapsed zeolite. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized for its specific function, improving overall capture efficiency. The modular two-stage design can be implemented using separate adsorption columns, making the complexity manageable and the system easier to operate and maintain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first stage of the two-stage process performs preliminary water removal from the gas stream before CO2 adsorption. This preliminary action is crucial because water can interfere with the CO2 adsorption process. By removing water first using molecular sieve 3A, the subsequent CO2 adsorption stage operates more efficiently, enhancing overall capture efficiency while maintaining system manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If multiple adsorption columns are used for continuous operation, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing and operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation capabilityVSAvoidnumber of adsorption columns
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs multiple adsorption columns configured for continuous operation. While one column is adsorbing CO2, another column is being regenerated, ensuring continuous CO2 capture capability. This continuity approach improves productivity by eliminating downtime between adsorption cycles. The columns can be arranged in parallel configurations, and the regeneration process can be automated, managing the operational complexity while maintaining continuous productive action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process enhances CO2 capture efficiency and reduces separation costs by selectively adsorbing CO2 from atmospheric air or industrial gases, allowing for continuous operation with multiple adsorption columns and minimal regeneration downtime.

Implementation Method 1

The first stage of the process selectively adsorbs water (H2O) in the gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

the second stage subsequently uses the collapsed zeolite to selectively capture CO2 from the dried gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS20250269317A1Two-stage carbon dioxide adsorption using collapsed zeolite with ultra-small pores
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US20250269317A1 patent drawing
  • US20250269317A1 patent drawing
  • US20250269317A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of separating carbon dioxide (CO2) from air, where the method includes: feeding air into a cooler to generate cooled air, the cooled air including nitrogen (N2), oxygen (O2), water (H2O), and CO2; feeding the cooled air to a first adsorption column including a first zeolite adsorbent to selectively capture the H2O from the cooled air, generating dried cooled air; and feeding the dried cooled air to a second adsorption column including a second zeolite adsorbent to selectively capture the CO2 from the dried cooled air, generating a tail gas, wherein the second zeolite adsorbent includes a Linde Type A (LTA) aluminosilicate zeolite that is hydrolyzed and at least partially collapsed.