Two-Stage Feedback Procedure for Wireless HARQ Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in feedback procedures, particularly in reducing retransmissions for ensuring latency and reliability parameters in hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) processes, as they lack comprehensive channel information for adjusting transmission parameters.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a two-stage feedback procedure where the first stage includes acknowledgments (ACKs) or negative acknowledgments (NACKs) and the second stage provides additional feedback information about channel characteristics for component carriers that failed to decode, allowing for adjustments in transmission parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single-stage feedback procedure is used, then the feedback procedure is simple, but comprehensive channel information is not available for adjusting transmission parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback procedure complexityVSAvoidchannel information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback procedure is divided into two distinct stages: first feedback carrying ACK/NACK for each component carrier, and second feedback carrying additional channel information. This segmentation allows comprehensive information collection while maintaining clear procedural structure and reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback information is organized across two dimensional layers: the first layer (first feedback) provides basic acknowledgment status, while the second layer (second feedback) provides detailed channel characteristics. This dimensional approach enables comprehensive information collection without overwhelming the feedback mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive channel information is collected, then transmission parameters can be precisely adjusted, but feedback procedure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel information accuracyVSAvoidfeedback procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Feedback information is segmented into two categories: basic acknowledgment (ACK/NACK) in the first feedback, and detailed channel measurements in the second feedback. This segmentation enables precise measurement collection while managing complexity through structured organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first feedback stage performs preliminary acknowledgment before the second stage collects detailed channel information. This preliminary action allows the system to prepare for precise measurements only when needed, reducing overall complexity while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If detailed feedback information is transmitted, then retransmissions are reduced, but uplink resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoiduplink resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Uplink resources are segmented into two separate allocations: one for first feedback (ACK/NACK) and another for second feedback (channel information). This segmentation allows efficient resource utilization by matching resource quantity to information type, reducing total resource requirements while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second feedback acts as an intermediary that provides detailed channel information only when necessary (when ACK/NACK indicates issues). This intermediary approach reduces overall resource requirements by transmitting comprehensive information selectively rather than continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If two-stage feedback is implemented, then retransmissions are reduced, but feedback procedure time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidfeedback procedure time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The two-stage feedback operates as a periodic procedure where the first feedback is transmitted regularly for each component carrier, and the second feedback is transmitted periodically with additional channel information. This periodic structure reduces overall procedure time by establishing a predictable rhythm rather than requiring continuous comprehensive feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The first feedback stage performs preliminary acknowledgment quickly, allowing the system to determine whether the second detailed feedback stage is necessary. This preliminary action reduces overall time loss by avoiding unnecessary transmission of comprehensive information when channels are already functioning correctly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11889502B2Two-stage feedback procedures
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11889502B2 patent drawing
  • US11889502B2 patent drawing
  • US11889502B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. Techniques are described for providing additional feedback about a channel as part of a feedback procedure. Feedback information associated with a feedback procedure may include two stages of feedback information. Each stage of feedback information may include a different type of information. A first stage may include acknowledgements or negative acknowledgements for each feedback process supported. A second stage may include additional feedback information related to any downlink transmission that was not received successfully and thus included a negative acknowledgement in the first stage. Additionally, or alternatively, the second stage may include additional feedback information related to any downlink transmission that was received successfully and thus included an acknowledgement in the first stage. Techniques are also described for handling the variable size of the feedback information included in the two stages.