Two-Stage Hydrofinishing for Low-Aromatic Base Oils

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern refining processes for producing lubricating oils often result in base oils with undesirable levels of aromatics, residual organic sulfur, and/or nitrogen, despite using hydrogen processes to improve lubricating properties and low temperature performance.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage hydrofinishing process using a crystalline molecular sieve SSZ-91 and noble metal catalysts under varying temperature conditions to produce a low aromatic base oil, with the second stage operating at a lower temperature than the first.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single-stage hydrofinishing process is used, then the process complexity is low, but the aromatic content in the base oil remains high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess complexityVSAvoidaromatic content
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrofinishing process is divided into two distinct stages: first hydrofinishing at higher temperature (350-450°C) to remove sulfur and nitrogen, followed by second hydrofinishing at lower temperature (250-350°C) to saturate aromatic molecules. This segmentation allows each stage to target specific contaminants optimally, achieving low aromatic content (≤5 wt%) that cannot be attained in a single stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the temperature parameter between stages - the first stage operates at higher temperature (350-450°C) for efficient removal of heteroatoms, while the second stage operates at lower temperature (250-350°C) to selectively saturate aromatic rings without excessive cracking. This parameter variation optimizes the removal of different harmful components at appropriate conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If hydrofinishing is performed at high temperature to remove sulfur and nitrogen, then heteroatom removal efficiency is high, but aromatic saturation is incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheteroatom removal efficiencyVSAvoidaromatic content
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The process segments heteroatom removal and aromatic saturation into two sequential stages with different temperature conditions. The first high-temperature stage efficiently removes sulfur and nitrogen, while the second low-temperature stage focuses on aromatic saturation, ensuring both functions are optimally performed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Temperature is changed between stages to match the optimal conditions for different reactions. High temperature (350-450°C) in the first stage maximizes heteroatom removal kinetics, while lower temperature (250-350°C) in the second stage favors aromatic hydrogenation without promoting unwanted side reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-generated harmful factors

If hydrofinishing is performed at low temperature to saturate aromatics, then aromatic content is reduced, but heteroatom removal is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatic contentVSAvoidheteroatom removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the treatment objectives into two stages: the first stage at high temperature handles heteroatom removal, while the second stage at lower temperature handles aromatic saturation. This segmentation ensures each function is performed under optimal conditions without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The temperature parameter is varied between stages to optimize different reaction pathways. The first stage uses high temperature (350-450°C) to accelerate heteroatom removal reactions, while the second stage uses lower temperature (250-350°C) to selectively saturate aromatics with minimal cracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-generated harmful factors

If a two-stage hydrofinishing process is used, then aromatic content is significantly reduced, but the process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatic contentVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process is segmented into two hydrofinishing stages with different temperature conditions and catalyst requirements. This segmentation achieves superior aromatic reduction (≤5 wt%) that cannot be obtained in a single stage, justifying the increased complexity through significant performance improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By changing temperature parameters between stages and using appropriate catalysts for each stage, the process achieves optimal aromatic saturation while maintaining reasonable operational complexity. The first stage (350-450°C) removes heteroatoms, and the second stage (250-350°C) saturates aromatics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process significantly reduces aromatics in the base oil by up to 50% compared to single-stage processes, resulting in a high-quality base oil with improved properties such as lower aromatics, pour point, and cloud point spread.

Implementation Method 1

contacting an isomerized stream with a noble metal hydrofinishing catalyst under 1st hydrofinishing conditions to provide a 1st hydrofinished stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

Hydrodewaxing is typically a process for improving the low temperature properties by isomerizing the long chain waxy molecules

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIsomerization:

Implementation Method 3

Hydrofinishing typically describes a process to further upgrade the lubricating base oil quality including color and oxidation stability often by saturating the aromatic molecules

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentUS12577478B2Method for producing high quality base oils using two stage hydrofinishing
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 CHEVRON USA INC
  • US12577478B2 patent drawing
  • US12577478B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are processes to produce base oils with one more improved properties, e.g., lower aromatics, economically and/or efficiently. In some embodiments, the processes relate to two stage (or more) hydrofinishing which advantageously provides base oils with lower aromatics than comparable one stage processes.