Two-Stage Mixing System for Building Material Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated building material application systems fail to ensure consistent properties in the building material, leading to irregularities in structures produced, particularly due to inadequate mixing of components.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage mixing process using a first mixer for initial component mixing and a second mixer for final component integration, along with a modular and automated system for precise metering and application, ensuring better mixing and energy input, which results in a more consistent and cost-effective building material.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single mixer is used for mixing building material components, then the device complexity is reduced, but the mixing consistency and quality of the building material deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing system complexityVSAvoidbuilding material consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing process is divided into two separate stages with two distinct mixers. The first mixer combines the first component with the second component, and the second mixer combines the resulting first component with the third component. This segmentation allows each mixer to specialize in specific mixing tasks, ensuring consistent and high-quality mixing results while maintaining manageable device complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If more mixing energy is introduced to improve mixing quality, then the building material consistency improves, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing qualityVSAvoidmixing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The total mixing energy is divided into two stages across two separate mixers. Each mixer operates at optimized energy levels for its specific mixing task, avoiding the need for a single high-energy mixer. This segmentation achieves high mixing quality while distributing and optimizing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first mixer performs preliminary mixing of the first and second components before they enter the second mixer. This preliminary action prepares the material in advance, reducing the energy required in the second mixing stage and achieving overall high mixing quality with optimized total energy input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If individual components are fed separately to ensure stability and automation, then the ease of operation and automation improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation capabilityVSAvoidfeeding system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feeding system is segmented into separate feeding devices for each component (first component, second component, third component). Each feeding device handles one component independently, ensuring stability and ease of automated operation. The modular segmented architecture manages complexity by breaking down the feeding system into manageable, independent units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Components are fed and prepared in advance in their individual stable states before mixing. The first component is fed to the first mixer, where it is preliminarily mixed with the second component, and then the resulting first component is fed to the second mixer with the third component. This preliminary action ensures each component is ready for mixing, improving automation while managing complexity through sequential processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves a more consistent building material with reduced air pockets and water consumption, allowing for high-quality, reproducible structures with faster solidification and reduced additive usage, enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the application process.

Implementation Method 1

mixing the first constituent and the second constituent of the first component in a first mixer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMixing: Stirring

Implementation Method 2

mixing the first component and the second component in a second mixer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMixing: Stirring

Implementation Method 3

by providing two mixers, more energy can be introduced into the building material. This leads to better mixing, fewer air pockets in the building material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy input: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP4086056B1Method of manufacturing a structure from a building material
Publication Date: 2024.03.27 SIKA TECH AG
  • EP4086056B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4086056B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4086056B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A system for applying a building material comprises: a first component of the building material, which includes a first component and a second component; a second component of the building material; a first mixer for mixing the first component and the second component; a feeding device for feeding the first component to the mixer; a movement device for changing an application location in a room; and a second mixer for mixing the first component and the second component.