Two-Stage Object Detection for Reducing False Negatives

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated security systems face challenges in accurately detecting visual objects in videos due to limited computational resources on camera devices, leading to false negatives and missed classifications, which can be inefficient and require manual user input for correction.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilizes a first object detector on a camera device to identify potential missed object detections, which are then sent to a cloud server with more computational resources for further processing by a second object detector, allowing for user input to confirm and label interesting objects, thereby improving detection accuracy and reducing false negatives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a first object detector with limited computational resources is used on camera devices, then device complexity and cost are reduced, but detection accuracy deteriorates leading to false negatives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resourcesVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into two parts: a lightweight first object detector deployed on edge devices (cameras) for initial processing, and a more powerful second object detector deployed in the cloud for re-processing uncertain cases. This segmentation allows each component to have appropriate computational resources for its function, resolving the contradiction between device complexity and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A cloud server acts as an intermediary between the first object detector and the final detection results. The cloud server receives video data from the first detector, applies a confidence threshold filter, and sends uncertain cases to the second object detector for re-processing. This intermediary mechanism allows the system to leverage both edge and cloud computational resources optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual user input is required for correcting missed detections, then detection accuracy can be improved, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-correction by automatically identifying false negatives through the two-stage detection process. The first object detector continuously monitors video streams, and when it encounters uncertain cases (low confidence scores), it automatically triggers re-processing by the second object detector in the cloud, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through the cloud server that receives detection results from the first object detector, evaluates their confidence scores, and provides corrective feedback by re-processing uncertain cases with the second object detector. This automated feedback loop continuously improves detection accuracy without requiring manual review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If video data is sent to cloud server for re-processing, then detection accuracy is improved by leveraging additional computational resources, but loss of time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of sending all video data to the cloud for re-processing (excessive action), the system applies partial action by selectively re-processing only those video segments where the first object detector achieved low confidence scores. This selective approach minimizes time loss and energy consumption while maintaining the benefit of improved detection accuracy for uncertain cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12165409B2Reducing false negatives and finding new classes in object detectors
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US12165409B2 patent drawing
  • US12165409B2 patent drawing
  • US12165409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Reducing false negatives and finding new classes in object detectors is disclosed. Also disclosed is a method that includes grouping together a plurality of cropped image portions from region proposals based on image properties. The method also includes receiving first user input that either establishes that the grouped together, cropped image portions relate to uninteresting objects or establishes that the grouped together, cropped image portions relate to an object class of interesting objects. The method also includes obtaining, only when the grouped together, cropped image portions relate to the object class of interesting objects, second user input that includes an object label corresponding to the object class of interesting objects.