Two-Stage Urea Hydrolysis and Stripping Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for treating aqueous urea solutions from urea production plants struggle to reduce residual urea and ammonia concentrations to 1 ppm or lower while minimizing apparatus size, as they require increased residence time and larger apparatus sizes, and inefficient gas-liquid contact in strippers hinders ammonia removal.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a two-stage process with steam stripping and catalytic hydrolysis using two catalyst beds at high temperatures and pressures, with countercurrent steam contact to enhance urea hydrolysis and separate ammonia and carbon dioxide, minimizing apparatus size by increasing liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) and using catalysts like Ti, V, Fe, and oxides for efficient decomposition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a single hydrolyzer is used to reduce residual urea to 1 ppm or lower, then the urea concentration is reduced, but the residence time must be increased and the apparatus size becomes large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveurea concentrationVSAvoidapparatus size
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the hydrolysis process into two separate stages: a first hydrolyzer that performs initial hydrolysis at lower temperature (130-180°C) and a second hydrolyzer that completes hydrolysis at higher temperature (180-230°C). This segmentation allows each unit to be compact while achieving the overall goal of reducing urea to 1 ppm or lower without requiring a single large apparatus

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operating parameters between the two hydrolyzers: the first hydrolyzer operates at lower temperature (130-180°C) and the second at higher temperature (180-230°C). This parameter change enables efficient hydrolysis at different stages, allowing compact design while achieving high urea removal efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by stationary object

If hydrolysis is carried out at low temperature and pressure (0.3 to 1.1 MPa, 130° C. to 180° C.), then energy consumption is reduced, but the reaction rate is slow and LHSV must be low requiring large apparatus size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidreaction rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the hydrolysis process into two temperature zones: the first hydrolyzer operates at moderate temperature (130-180°C) consuming less energy, while the second hydrolyzer operates at high temperature (180-230°C) achieving fast reaction rate. This segmentation allows the system to benefit from both low energy consumption and high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention ensures continuous hydrolysis action by connecting the first and second hydrolyzers in series, where the effluent from the first hydrolyzer becomes the feed for the second. This continuous action maintains high productivity throughout the process while managing energy consumption efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Device complexity

If stripping is carried out without trays or packing for gas-liquid contact, then apparatus complexity is reduced, but gas-liquid contact area is insufficient and stripping efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestripper structureVSAvoidstripping efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses packing materials with high surface area to volume ratio inside the stripper to provide extensive gas-liquid contact area. These porous or structured packing materials enable efficient mass transfer of ammonia and carbon dioxide from liquid to gas phase without requiring complex tray structures, thus maintaining low device complexity while achieving high stripping efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively reduces residual urea and ammonia concentrations to 1 ppm or lower, increases LHSV, and minimizes apparatus size by promoting efficient hydrolysis and stripping, overcoming the limitations of single-bed hydrolyzers and inefficient gas-liquid contact in existing technologies.

Implementation Method 1

a first stripping step of stripping an aqueous solution containing urea, ammonia and carbon dioxide with steam at a pressure of 0.2 to 0.6 MPaA in a first stripper to separate ammonia and carbon dioxide from this aqueous solution into a gas phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

a hydrolysis step of hydrolyzing urea in the solution obtained from the first stripping step at an LHSV of 10 to 20 h−1, at a pressure of 1.1 to 3.1 MPaA and at a temperature of 180 to 230° C. in a catalytic hydrolyzer which is a hydrolyzer including a catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

a hydrolysis step of hydrolyzing urea in the solution obtained from the first stripping step

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 4

a second stripping step of stripping a liquid obtained from the hydrolysis step with steam in a second stripper to separate ammonia and carbon dioxide from this liquid into a gas phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS10280094B2Method and apparatus for treating urea aqueous solution
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 TOYO ENG CORP
  • US10280094B2 patent drawing
  • US10280094B2 patent drawing
  • US10280094B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for treating a urea aqueous solution includes a first stripping step of steam stripping an aqueous solution containing urea, ammonia and carbon dioxide at 0.2 to 0.6 MPaA in a first stripper to separate ammonia and carbon dioxide from this aqueous solution into a gas phase; a hydrolysis step of hydrolyzing urea in the solution obtained from the first stripping step at an LHSV of 10 to 20 h−1, at 1.1 to 3.1 MPaA and 180 to 230° C. in a catalytic hydrolyzer; and a second stripping step of steam stripping a liquid obtained in the hydrolysis step in a second stripper to separate ammonia and carbon dioxide from this liquid into a gas phase. The residual urea concentration can be reduced to 1 ppm or lower; the residual ammonia concentration can be decreased; LHSV can be increased; and an increase in apparatus size is minimized.