Two-State Symmetric Protocol for RFID Tag Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing RFID tag interrogation systems face challenges in efficiently re-inventorying tags that were initially in a quiet state, as they may miss tags due to unfavorable multipath conditions, distance, or power fluctuations, leading to incomplete identification and potential interference issues.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a two-state symmetric protocol allows tags to maintain persistent states (State A and State B) that persist for at least 20 seconds, enabling re-inventory without power, with commands like QuietA and QuietB ensuring tags are addressed and identified in subsequent rounds, even if initially missed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a ready-quiet protocol is used to inventory tags, then tags can be read one at a time, but tags in quiet state may be missed due to timeout or failed wake-up commands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetag identification completenessVSAvoidinventory time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic state management where tags transition between State A and State B based on persistent node values. The system dynamically adjusts which state is active based on the least recently used state, ensuring tags remain accessible without fixed timeouts. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by making the quiet state duration adaptive rather than static, preventing tags from being permanently missed while maintaining efficient inventory operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of state persistence by implementing a persistent node that maintains state information across power cycles. Instead of using fixed timeout periods, the system uses the persistent node to track state A and state B, allowing tags to maintain their state indefinitely until explicitly changed by a command. This parameter change from time-based to state-based management ensures complete tag identification without time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a persistent quiet timeout is used, then tags remain in quiet state for a fixed duration, but manufacturing tight control of persistence time is difficult and time duration is insufficient for large inventories

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate persistence controlVSAvoidtag manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a persistent node that copies and stores state information (State A or State B) in non-volatile memory. Instead of relying on precise manufacturing of timeout circuits, the system copies the state value and preserves it indefinitely. This copying approach eliminates the need for tightly controlled persistence time in hardware, as the state is maintained through data storage rather than physical timing mechanisms, greatly simplifying manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/timing-based persistent quiet mechanism with a data-based persistent node system. Instead of using hardware timers or RC circuits that require precise manufacturing tolerances, the system uses memory storage to maintain state information. This substitution of mechanical timing with digital data storage eliminates manufacturing complexity while ensuring reliable state persistence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If tags are placed in quiet state after inventory, then continuous monitoring can be performed, but tags may be missed if they remain in wrong state for extended periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous inventory capabilityVSAvoidtag detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic state reversal where the system alternates between inventoring tags in State A and tags in State B. By periodically switching which state is active for inventory, the system ensures that tags previously in quiet state become accessible in subsequent cycles. This periodic action maintains continuous monitoring capability while preventing tags from being permanently missed, as each state reversal brings previously quiet tags into an accessible state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly enhances the performance of RFID tag identification by ensuring all tags can be inventoried timely and accurately, reducing missed tags and interference, and allowing continuous monitoring of tagged items.

Implementation Method 1

RFID tags which may be powered by the RF energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic energy harvesting: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS8102244B2Methods and apparatuses to identify devices
Publication Date: 2012.01.24 RUIZHANG TECH LTD CO
  • US8102244B2 patent drawing
  • US8102244B2 patent drawing
  • US8102244B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method to identify devices including a first set of commands to identify devices in a first state and a second set of commands to identify devices in a second state, wherein devices identified in the first state are placed in the second state and devices identified in the second state are placed in the first state.