Two-Step Enzymatic Production of L-Glufosinate From Racemate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing glufosinate yield a racemic mixture of L- and D-glufosinate, with L-glufosinate being more potent, and there is a need for cost-effective methods to produce pure L-glufosinate or a mixture enriched for L-glufosinate.

Innovation Solution

A two-step process involving oxidative deamination of D-glufosinate to PPO using a D-amino acid oxidase enzyme, followed by amination of PPO to L-glufosinate using a transaminase enzyme, with modified enzymes having increased activity to achieve high yields of L-glufosinate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If current commercial chemical synthesis methods are used to produce glufosinate, then the production process is simple and cost-effective, but the output is a racemic mixture containing both L- and D-glufosinate, resulting in reduced potency and increased material consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestereoisomeric purityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The synthesis process is divided into two distinct enzymatic steps: (1) oxidative deamination of D-glufosinate to PPO using D-amino acid oxidase, and (2) amination of PPO to L-glufosinate using transaminase. This segmentation allows selective production of the desired L-isomer while avoiding formation of the unwanted D-isomer, thereby achieving high stereoisomeric purity through a modular process design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

PPO (2-oxo-4-(hydroxy(methyl)phosphinoyl)butyric acid) serves as a chiral intermediary compound that bridges the conversion from racemic glufosinate to pure L-glufosinate. The intermediary PPO allows the process to selectively generate the L-isomer through controlled enzymatic reactions, enabling high stereoisomeric purity without requiring complex separation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If a two-step enzymatic process is implemented to produce pure L-glufosinate, then the stereoisomeric purity and herbicide potency are improved, but the process complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield of L-glufosinateVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The process employs unlabelled water as a reactant in the oxidative deamination step, eliminating the need for expensive external reagents. The D-amino acid oxidase enzyme utilizes molecular oxygen from air and water to perform the deamination, making the process economically viable while maintaining high yield of L-glufosinate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The process optimizes reaction parameters including pH (maintained between 7-9), temperature (20-40°C), and enzyme concentrations to achieve maximum yield. By controlling these parameters, the process achieves at least 85% yield of L-glufosinate from the starting material, improving productivity while keeping manufacturing costs manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If modified enzymes with increased activity are used to drive the reaction, then the reaction rate and yield are improved, but the cost of enzyme production and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzyme activityVSAvoidenzyme modification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process uses D-amino acid oxidase with moderate activity (at least 3 µmol/min*mg) rather than requiring extremely high activity enzymes. This partial action approach, combined with process optimization and enzyme recycling, achieves the desired yield without the need for excessively active (and therefore more expensive) enzymes, balancing productivity with manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves a yield of at least 85% L-glufosinate from a racemic mixture, providing a more potent herbicide with reduced amounts needed for effective weed control.

Implementation Method 1

The first step of the process involves the oxidative deamination of D-glufosinate to PPO (2-oxo-4-(hydroxy(methyl)phosphinoyl)butyric acid)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidative deamination: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

The second step involves the specific amination of PPO to L-glufosinate, using an amine group from one or more amine donors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTransamination: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS20250327103A1Methods for making l-glufosinate
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 BASF SE
  • US20250327103A1 patent drawing
  • US20250327103A1 patent drawing
  • US20250327103A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for the production of L-glufosinate (also known as phosphinothricin or (S)-2-amino-4-(hydroxy(methyl)phosphonoyl)butanoic acid) are provided. The methods comprise a two-step process. The first step involves the oxidative deamination of D-glufosinate to PPO (2-oxo-4-(hydroxy(methyl)phosphinoyl)butyric acid). The second step involves the specific amination of PPO to L-glufosinate, using an amine group from one or more amine donors. By combining these two reactions, the proportion of L-glufosinate in a mixture of L-glufosinate and D-glufosinate can be substantially increased.